The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The acceptance model of intuitive eating: A comparison of women in emerging adulthood, early adulthood, and middle adulthood.
Abstract
The acceptance model of intuitive eating (Avalos & Tylka, 2006) posits that body acceptance by others helps women appreciate their body and resist adopting an observer's perspective of their body, which contribute to their eating intuitively/adaptively. We extended this model by integrating body mass index (BMI) into its structure and investigating it with emerging (ages 18-25 years old, n = 318), early (ages 26-39 years old, n = 238), and middle (ages 40-65 years old, n = 245) adult women. Multiple-group analysis revealed that this model fit the data for all age groups. Body appreciation and resistance to adopt an observer's perspective mediated the body acceptance by others-intuitive eating link. Body acceptance by others mediated the social support-body appreciation and BMI-body appreciation links. Early and middle adult women had stronger negative BMI-body acceptance by others and BMI-intuitive eating relationships and a stronger positive body acceptance by others-body appreciation relationship than emerging adult women. Early adult women had a stronger positive resistance to adopt observer's perspective-body appreciation relationship than emerging and middle adult women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.
Arnett, J. J. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.469 · Cited by 16,843
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 · Cited by 6,552
Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x · Cited by 5,531 · cited 10×
“Objectification theory posits that when women are valued primarily for their appearance, they start to view themselves as “sights” via the lens of others (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997, p. 180).”
BackgroundInfluentialPositive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing
Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.7.678 · Cited by 2,334
Birch, L. L., Fisher, J. O., & Davison, K. K. (2003) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/78.2.215 · Cited by 904
Social support and adaptation to stress by the elderly
Cutrona, C., Russell, D., & Rose, J. (1986) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.1.1.47 · Cited by 337
Minding the body: yoga, embodiment, and well-being.
Impett, E. A., Daubenmier, J. J., & Hirschman, A. L. (2006) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1525/srsp.2006.3.4.39 · Cited by 216
Cited by
What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition
Tylka, T. L., & Wood-Barcalow, N. L. (2015) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.04.001 · Cited by 1,293
Self-citationThe Body Appreciation Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation
Tylka, T. L., & Wood-Barcalow, N. L. (2015) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.09.006 · Cited by 1,298
#bodypositivity: A Content Analysis of Body Positive Accounts on Instagram
Cohen, R., Irwin, L., Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. (2019) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.02.007 · Cited by 401
Body appreciation and its psychological correlates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Linardon, J., McClure, Z., Tylka, T. L., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2022) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.07.003 · Cited by 281
Self-citationConsiderations of positive body image across various social identities and special populations
Tiggemann, M. (2015) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.03.002 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Tylka, T. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-125
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1996224666
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The acceptance model of intuitive eating: A comparison of women in emerging adulthood, early adulthood, and middle adulthood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0022129
- The paper
- Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Tylka, T. L. (2011). The acceptance model of intuitive eating: A comparison of women in emerging adulthood, early adulthood, and middle adulthood. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
