Cited by 282Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Body appreciation and its psychological correlates: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Linardon, Jake, McClure, Zoe, Tylka, Tracy L., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew·2022·Body Image

Abstract

Body appreciation, defined as accepting, holding favourable attitudes towards, and respecting the body, is the most widely studied facet of positive body image. Despite more than 15 years of research investigating associations between body appreciation and psychological wellbeing constructs, a synthesis of this literature has yet to be performed. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis of research on body appreciation and its psychological correlates. Two-hundred-forty papers were included, of which only eight investigated prospective associations. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on 35 cross-sectional correlates of body appreciation. Prospective associations were reviewed qualitatively. Meta-analyses showed that body appreciation was inversely associated with numerous indices of eating (eating pathology, restraint) and body image disturbances (appearance-ideal internalization, body surveillance, sociocultural pressures), and general psychopathology (depression, anxiety). Body appreciation was positively associated with several adaptive wellbeing constructs (self-esteem, self-compassion, sexual satisfaction). Crucially, pooled associations were still evident after controlling for the influence of negative body image. Qualitative synthesis showed that body appreciation may also promote better wellbeing over time. Findings confirm that body appreciation is consistently associated with better psychological wellbeing. Body appreciation shows promise as a viable intervention target in mental health promotion initiatives and eating disorder prevention programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.07.003

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linardon, J., McClure, Z., Tylka, T. L., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Linardon, Jake
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
42
Pages
287-296
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286615184
Cited by
281
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 12
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1196948)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
body appreciation, positive body image, psychological well-being, eating pathology, dietary restraint, body surveillance, sociocultural pressure, depression, anxiety, self-esteem, self-compassion, sexual satisfaction, eating disorder prevention, mental health promotion
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review