Cited by 79Aging and Gerontology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory Processes and Influences

Normal aging dampens the link between intrusive thoughts and negative affect in reaction to daily stressors.

Open access
Brose, Annette, Schmiedek, Florian, Lövdén, Martin, Lindenberger, Ulman·2011·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

We charted daily variations in intrusive thoughts to gain access to adult age differences in affective reactivity to daily stressors. On 100 days, 101 younger and 103 older adults reported stressors, intrusive thoughts, and negative affect. Although increments in intrusive thoughts were similar in both age groups on days with stressors, older adults' negative affect increased less than younger adults' on such days. In addition, (a) levels of intrusive thoughts and negative affect across study time were positively associated; (b) days with increased thoughts were days with increased negative affect; and (c) experiencing above-average intrusive thoughts about stressors strengthened affective reactions to stress. Relative to younger adults, all three associations were reduced in older adults. We tentatively conclude that normal aging dampens the stress-induced link between intrusive thoughts and affect. This dampening may contribute to preserved affective well-being and reduced affective reactivity to daily stress in old age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0022287

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies of intra-individual emotion variability fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically control for it.

    “most studies of intra-individual emotion variability simply fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically “control” for it20–28.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2011-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
488-502
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2098896497
Cited by
79
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Max Planck Society (M.FE.A.BILD0005)
  • German Federal Ministry for Education and Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
intrusive thoughts, negative affect, daily hassles, normal aging, emotional reactivity, older adults, age differences, emotional well-being, stress response
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Stress, Psychological, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review