Cited by 7Mind wandering and attentionMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Ageing and thought suppression performance: Its relationship with working memory capacity, habitual thought suppression and mindfulness

Open access
Erskine, James A.K., Georgiou, George J., Joshi, Manavi, Deans, Andrew, Colegate, Charlene·2017·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

A study investigated how the ability to suppress thoughts in the laboratory was affected by type of thought suppressed (positive, negative, neutral), participants' age and working memory capacity (WMC). Linked variables (Use of thought suppression, social desirability, and mindfulness) were measured to assess whether they modified susceptibility to thought intrusion. Younger, middle aged and older adults suppressed three different valenced thoughts in a counterbalanced order for 5-min per thought. Participants then completed a WMC task and questionnaire measures of the linked variables. Valence had no effect on intrusions. WMC was positively related to intrusions; higher WMC corresponded to greater intrusions. Age was negatively related to intrusions; with increasing age intrusions decreased. Hierarchical regression showed only age and backward digit span (WMC) significantly predicted intrusions. The relationship between WMC and intrusions was not moderated by age. WMC and age both independently predict level of intrusion, and no synergistic effect was found.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.019

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In line with the perceptual load theory of attention, a high perceptual load of attention on other material may prevent unwanted distractors from intruding.

    “In line with the perceptual load theory of attention (Lavie & Tsal, 1994), a high perceptual load of attention on other material (in our study: the breath) may prevent unwanted distractors from intruding (Erskine et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Uleman, J. S., & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.). (1989). Unintended thought . Guilford Press.
  2. Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological review , 101 , 34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erskine, J. A. K., Georgiou, G. J., Joshi, M., Deans, A., & Colegate, C.
Affiliations
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Erskine, James A.K.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
53
Pages
211-221
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2733617873
Cited by
7
References
63
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
thought suppression, aging, working memory capacity, mindfulness, older adults, backward digit span, social desirability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Thinking, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review