Cited by 799Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Prevalence and correlates of DSM-5-defined eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of U.S. Adults

Open access
Udo, Tomoko, Grilo, Carlos M.·2018·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Few population-based data on the prevalence of eating disorders exist, and such data are especially needed because of changes to diagnoses in the DSM-5. This study aimed to provide lifetime and 12-month prevalence estimates of DSM-5-defined anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge-eating disorder (BED) from the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.Methods A national sample of 36,306 U.S. adults completed structured diagnostic interviews (Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5).Results Prevalence estimates of lifetime AN, BN, and BED were 0.80% (SE 0.07%), 0.28% (SE 0.03%), and 0.85% (SE 0.05%), respectively. Twelve-month estimates for AN, BN, and BED were 0.05% (SE 0.02%), 0.14% (SE 0.02%), and 0.44% (SE 0.04%). The odds of lifetime and 12-month diagnoses of all three eating disorders were significantly greater for women than for men after adjusting for age, race and/or ethnicity, education, and income. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of lifetime AN diagnosis were significantly lower for non-Hispanic black and Hispanic respondents than for white respondents. AORs of lifetime and 12-month BN diagnoses did not differ significantly by race and/or ethnicity. The AOR of lifetime, but not 12-month, BED diagnosis was significantly lower for non-Hispanic black respondents relative to that of non-Hispanic white respondents; AORs of BED for Hispanic and non-Hispanic white respondents did not differ significantly. AN, BN, and BED were characterized by significant differences in age of onset, persistence and duration of episodes, and rates of current obesity and psychosocial impairment.Conclusions These findings for DSM-5-defined eating disorders, based on the largest national sample of U.S. adults studied to date, indicate some important similarities to and differences from earlier, smaller nationally representative studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.03.014

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Not all mental health conditions can be work related; some conditions occur in patients of nonworking age (e.g., median age of onset of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa is below 18), or some conditions (such as certain manic episodes) can be induced by medications.

    “Not all mental health conditions can be work related; for instance, some conditions occur in patients of nonworking age (e.g., the median age of onset of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa is below 18 [34]), or some conditions (such as certain manic episodes) can be induced by medications.”

    From Mindfulness-based Practices in Workers to Address Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [34]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Grant BF Goldstein RB Chou SP Saha TD Ruan WJ Huang B 2011 The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Version (AUDADIS-5) National Institite on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Rockville, MD

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Udo, T., & Grilo, C. M.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Udo, Tomoko
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
345-354
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801697874
Cited by
799
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 15 · 2013: 1
FWCI
83.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK070052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, prevalence, lifetime prevalence, 12-month prevalence, sex differences, racial and ethnic differences, age of onset, obesity, psychosocial impairment, NESARC
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, United States, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Age of Onset, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Bulimia Nervosa, Young Adult, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review