Cited by 279Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesElder Abuse and Neglect

Intimate partner violence and specific substance use disorders: Findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Open access
Smith, Philip H., Homish, Gregory G., Leonard, Kenneth E., Cornelius, Jack R.·2012·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

The association between substance use and intimate partner violence (IPV) is robust. It is less clear how the use of specific substances relates to relationship violence. This study examined IPV perpetration and victimization related to the following specific substance use disorders: alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opioid. The poly substance use of alcohol and cocaine, as well as alcohol and marijuana, were also examined. Data were analyzed from wave two of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (2004-2005). Associations between substance use disorders and IPV were tested using logistic regression models while controlling for important covariates and accounting for the complex survey design. Alcohol use disorders and cocaine use disorders were most strongly associated with IPV perpetration, while cannabis use disorders and opioid use disorders were most strongly associated with IPV victimization. A diagnosis of both an alcohol use disorder and cannabis use disorder decreased the likelihood of IPV perpetration compared to each individual substance use disorder. A diagnosis of both an alcohol use disorder and cocaine use disorder increased likelihood of reporting IPV perpetration compared with alcohol use disorders alone but decreased likelihood of perpetration compared with a cocaine use disorder diagnosis alone. Overall, substance use disorders were consistently related to intimate partner violence after controlling for important covariates. These results provide further evidence for the important link between substance use disorders and IPV and add to our knowledge of which specific substances may be related to relationship violence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0024855

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Partner substance use is associated with IPV and influences help seeking behaviours.

    “Given the established association between partner substance use and IPV [47, 48], as well as its influence on help seeking behaviours [49, 50], a composite measure was established to capture substance-related relationship strain.”

    From Locked down, locked out: a cross-sectional study on experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) and barriers to formal and informal support during COVID-19 lockdowns in Ontario (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Abstract and Results (Intimate Partner Violence; page unavailable) report an association between respondents’ substance use disorders and IPV perpetration or victimization. The paper measures respondents’ use, not specifically a partner’s use as reported by the other person. The help-seeking clause has separate citations and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, P. H., Homish, G. G., Leonard, K. E., & Cornelius, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Published
2012
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
236-245
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
OpenAlex
W2170162866
Cited by
279
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
ABMRF/The Foundation for Alcohol Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, substance use disorders, alcoholism, cannabis use disorder, cocaine dependence, opioid use disorder, polydrug use, IPV perpetration, IPV victimization, relationship violence
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholic Intoxication, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Spouse Abuse, United States, Violence, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Sex Distribution, Crime Victims, Substance-Related Disorders, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review