Cited by 400LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Substance use in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: An update on empirical research and implications for treatment.

Open access
Green, Kelly E., Feinstein, Brian A.·2012·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Historically, substance use problems were thought to be more prevalent in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations, and correcting skewed perceptions about substance abuse among LGB individuals is critically important. This review provides an update on empirical evidence on LGB substance use patterns and treatment outcome, with specific focus on clinical implications of findings. Compared to earlier studies, the recent research included in this review has used more sophisticated methodologies and more representative samples, and also has investigated multiple dimensions of sexual orientation in relation to substance use patterns. Findings from recent research suggest that lesbians and bisexual women are at greater risk for alcohol and drug use disorders and related problems, and that gay and bisexual men are at greater risk for illicit drug use and related problems. Several sociocultural factors have emerged as correlates of substance use patterns in LGB populations (e.g., affiliation with gay culture, HIV status), and several demographic characteristics (e.g., female, older age) do not appear to be as robust of protective factors against substance abuse for LGB individuals compared to heterosexual populations. Bisexual identity and/or behavior in particular seem to be related to increased risk for substance abuse. In terms of treatment outcome, limitations of extant research prevent conclusions about the relative impact of LGB-specific interventions, and further research that includes women and uses more equivalent comparison interventions is needed. Clinical implications of research findings are discussed for case identification, selection of treatment goals (e.g., moderation vs. abstinence), targets for intervention, and specific treatment modalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025424

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Driscoll R 1982 A gay-identified alcohol treatment program: A follow-up study Journal of Homosexuality 7 71 80 7130690
  2. Finnegan DG McNally EB 2002 Counseling Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Substance Abusers: Dual Identities New York Haworth Press
  3. Nanin JE Parsons JT 2006 Club drug use and risky sex among gay and bisexual men in New York City Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy 10 111 122
  4. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings Retrieved May 4, 2011 from the Office of Applied Studies at: http://www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov 27656739
  5. Zane NW Kim JC 1994 Substance use and abuse Zane NW Takeuchi DT Young KNJ Confronting critical health issues of Asian and Pacific Islander Americans 316 346 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications 316 346

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, K. E., & Feinstein, B. A.
Affiliations
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Published
2012-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
265-278
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
OpenAlex
W1964930089
Cited by
400
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32 AA07569)
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
substance use, lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations, sexual orientation, alcoholism, drug use disorders, bisexual identity, gay culture, HIV status, sociocultural risk factors, substance abuse treatment outcomes, treatment selection
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Bisexuality, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Psychological Theory, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Social Identification, United States, HIV Infections, Substance-Related Disorders, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review