Cited by 132LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Ecological momentary assessment of daily discrimination experiences and nicotine, alcohol, and drug use among sexual and gender minority individuals

Open access
Livingston, Nicholas A., Flentje, Annesa, Heck, Nicholas C., Szalda-Petree, Allen, Cochran, Bryan N.·2017·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals experience elevated rates of minority stress, which has been linked to higher rates of nicotine and substance use. Research on this disparity to date is largely predicated on methodology that is insensitive to within day SGM-based discrimination experiences, or their relation to momentary nicotine and substance use risk. We address this knowledge gap in the current study using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). METHOD: Fifty SGM individuals, between 18 and 45 years of age, were recruited from an inland northwestern university, regardless of their nicotine or substance use history, and invited to participate in an EMA study. Each were prompted to provide data, six times daily (between 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.) for 14 days, regarding SGM-based discrimination, other forms of mistreatment, and nicotine, drug, and alcohol use since their last prompt. RESULTS: Discrimination experiences that occurred since individuals' last measurement prompt were associated with greater odds of nicotine and substance use during the same measurement window. Substance use was also more likely to occur in relation to discrimination reported two measurements prior in lagged models. Relative to other forms of mistreatment, discrimination effects were consistently larger in magnitude and became stronger throughout the day/evening. CONCLUSION: This study adds to existing minority stress research by highlighting the both immediate and delayed correlates of daily SGM-based discrimination experiences. These results also contribute to our understanding of daily stress processes and provide insight into ways we might mitigate these effects using real-time monitoring and intervention technology. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000252

Cites

72 of 73 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The control condition's weekly self-monitoring has been shown to produce reductions in depression symptoms and improvements in behavioral health outcomes.

    “This type of self-monitoring has been shown to produce reductions in depression symptoms over time and yield improvement in behavioral health outcomes (Kauer et al., 2012; Livingston et al., 2017).”

    From Guided internet-based LGBTQ-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy: A randomized controlled trial among sexual minority men in China (2024) · cites this paper as Livingston et al., 2017

    The Clinical Implications section describes monitoring as a possible intervention that could help people identify substance-use risks, but does not report reductions in depression symptoms or improvements in behavioral health outcomes. The Results report no detectable change in nicotine or substance-use reports between weeks; a search for depression symptoms and monitoring-related improvements found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bolger N Laurenceau J 2013 Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research New York, NY The Guilford Press
  2. DeHart T Longua-Peterson J Richeson JA Hamilton HR 2014 A diary study of daily perceived mistreatment and alcohol consumption in college students Basic and Applied Social Psychology 36 5 443 451 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973533 · DOI
  3. Kamarck TW Shiffman S Wethington E 2011 Measuring psychosocial stress using ecological momentary assessment methods The handbook of stress science: Biology, psychology, and health 597 617 Springer Publishing Co New York, NY
  4. Nadal KL 2013 A brief history of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people and civil rights That's so gay! Microaggressions and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community 14 37 American Psychological Association Washington, DC doi: http://dx.doi.org/0.1037/14093-002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livingston, N. A., Flentje, A., Heck, N. C., Szalda-Petree, A., & Cochran, B. N.
Affiliations
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Marquette University (US)
  • University of Montana (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2017-12
Volume
85
Issue
12
Pages
1131-1143
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2773450731
Cited by
132
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Psychological Association
  • Association for Psychological Science
  • University of Montana
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA039800)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
discrimination experiences, minority stress, nicotine use, alcohol consumption, drug use, substance use, within-day variation, maltreatment, real-time monitoring
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review