Cited by 62Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Psychotherapy for bipolar II disorder: The role of interpersonal and social rhythm therapy.

Open access
Swartz, Holly A., Levenson, Jessica C., Frank, Ellen·2012·Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Abstract

Although bipolar II disorder is a highly prevalent, chronic illness that is associated with burdensome psychosocial impairment, relatively little is known about the best ways to treat the disorder. Moreover, psychosocial interventions for the management of bipolar II disorder have been largely unexplored, leaving psychologists with few evidence-based recommendations for best treatment practices. In this article, we provide information about interpersonal and social rhythm therapy (IPSRT), an empirically supported treatment for bipolar I disorder that has preliminary evidence supporting its efficacy in bipolar II disorder. After reviewing the phenomenology of bipolar II disorder and differentiating it from bipolar I disorder, we summarize the extant empirical support for using psychotherapy in the management of bipolar II disorder. We explore what is known about the role of psychotherapy in the management of bipolar II disorder as well as lacunae in the evidence base. Next, we introduce IPSRT and discuss how it has been adapted for use as a treatment for individuals suffering from bipolar II disorder. Specific strategies of the treatment are detailed, and preliminary evidence for the efficacy of IPSRT in bipolar II disorder is described. Finally, we present a case vignette demonstrating the use of IPSRT for an individual with bipolar II disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0027671

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swartz, H. A., Levenson, J. C., & Frank, E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Published
2012-04
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
145-153
ISSN
  • 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1323
OpenAlex
W2004944993
Cited by
62
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH084831)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
bipolar II disorder, interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, psychotherapy, psychosocial interventions, treatment efficacy, bipolar I disorder, treatment adaptation, case vignettes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review