Cited by 252Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

A randomized trial of integrated group therapy versus group drug counseling for patients with bipolar disorder and substance dependence

Open access
Weiss, Roger D., Griffin, Margaret L., Kolodziej, Monika E., Greenfield, Shelly F., Najavits, Lisa M., Daley, Dennis C., Doreau, Heidi Ray, Hennen, John A.·2007·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although bipolar disorder and substance use disorder frequently co-occur, there is little information on the effectiveness of behavioral treatment for this population. Integrated group therapy, which addresses the two disorders simultaneously, was compared with group drug counseling, which focuses on substance use. The authors hypothesized that patients receiving integrated group therapy would have fewer days of substance use and fewer weeks ill with bipolar disorder. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial compared 20 weeks of integrated group therapy or group drug counseling with 3 months of posttreatment follow-up. Sixty-two patients with bipolar disorder and current substance dependence, treated with mood stabilizers for >or=2 weeks, were randomly assigned to integrated group therapy (N=31) or group drug counseling (N=31). The primary outcome measure was the number of days of substance use. The primary mood outcome was the number of weeks ill with a mood episode. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significantly fewer days of substance use for integrated group therapy patients during treatment and follow-up. Groups were similar in the number of weeks ill with bipolar disorder during treatment and follow-up, although integrated group therapy patients had more depressive and manic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated group therapy, a new treatment developed specifically for patients with bipolar disorder and substance dependence, appears to be a promising approach to reduce substance use in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.100

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Chou SP, Dufour MC, Comp- ton W, Pickering RP, Kaplan K: Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61:807-816
  2. Brown ES, Nejtek VA, Perantie DC, Orsulak PJ, Bobadilla L: La- motrigine in patients with bipolar disorder and cocaine depen- dence. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64:197-201
  3. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Friedman B, Nielsen E, Endicott J, Mc- Donald-Scott P, Andreasen NC: The Longitudinal Interval Fol- low-up Evaluation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987; 44:540-548
  4. Drake RE, Essock SM, Shaner A, Carey KB, Minkoff K, Kola L, Lynde D, Osher FC, Clark RE, Rickards L: Implementing dual di- agnosis services for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52:469-476

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, R. D., Griffin, M. L., Kolodziej, M. E., Greenfield, S. F., Najavits, L. M., Daley, D. C., Doreau, H. R., & Hennen, J. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Weiss, Roger D.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-01
Volume
164
Issue
1
Pages
100-107
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2161512986
Cited by
252
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Dr. Ralph and Marian Falk Medical Research Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da009400-06)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA00326, K02DA000326, DA09400, R01DA015968, DA 15968)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, substance dependence, comorbid substance use disorders, mood episodes, substance use reduction, behavior therapy, mood stabilizers
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Counseling, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review