Cited by 162Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingStress and Burnout Research

Academics' experiences of a respite from work: Effects of self-critical perfectionism and perseverative cognition on postrespite well-being.

Flaxman, Paul E., Ménard, Julie, Bond, Frank W., Kinman, Gail·2012·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

This longitudinal study examined relations between personality and cognitive vulnerabilities and the outcomes of a respite from work. A sample of 77 academic employees responded to week-level measures of affective well-being before, during, and on 2 occasions after an Easter respite. When academics were classified as being either high or low in a self-critical form of perfectionism (doubts about actions), a divergent pattern of respite to postrespite effects was revealed. Specifically, during the respite, the 2 groups of academics experienced similar levels of well-being. However, during postrespite working weeks, the more perfectionistic academics reported significantly higher levels of fatigue, emotional exhaustion, and anxiety. The greater deterioration in well-being experienced by perfectionist academics when first returning to work was mediated by their tendency for perseverative cognition (i.e., worry and rumination) about work during the respite itself. These findings support the view that the self-critical perfectionist vulnerability is activated by direct exposure to achievement-related stressors and manifested through perseverative modes of thinking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028055

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flaxman, P. E., Ménard, J., Bond, F. W., & Kinman, G.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
  • University of Bedfordshire (GB)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2012-07
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
854-865
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2019180260
Cited by
162
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
City University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
self-critical perfectionism, perseverative cognition, rumination, worry, university faculty, emotional well-being, emotional exhaustion, fatigue, anxiety, return to work
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Cognition, Emotions, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Occupations, Personality, Self Concept, Universities, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review