The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Abstract
When data are collected via anonymous Internet surveys, particularly under conditions of obligatory participation (such as with student samples), data quality can be a concern. However, little guidance exists in the published literature regarding techniques for detecting careless responses. Previously several potential approaches have been suggested for identifying careless respondents via indices computed from the data, yet almost no prior work has examined the relationships among these indicators or the types of data patterns identified by each. In 2 studies, we examined several methods for identifying careless responses, including (a) special items designed to detect careless response, (b) response consistency indices formed from responses to typical survey items, (c) multivariate outlier analysis, (d) response time, and (e) self-reported diligence. Results indicated that there are two distinct patterns of careless response (random and nonrandom) and that different indices are needed to identify these different response patterns. We also found that approximately 10%-12% of undergraduates completing a lengthy survey for course credit were identified as careless responders. In Study 2, we simulated data with known random response patterns to determine the efficacy of several indicators of careless response. We found that the nature of the data strongly influenced the efficacy of the indices to identify careless responses. Recommendations include using identified rather than anonymous responses, incorporating instructed response items before data collection, as well as computing consistency indices and multivariate outlier analysis to ensure high-quality data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to Meade and Craig’s [40] recommendations, questionnaires with the same option (e.g., choice 1) throughout the whole questionnaire were excluded.”
From Effects of attractions and social attributes on peoples' usage intention and media dependence towards chatbot: The mediating role of parasocial interaction and emotional support (2025) · cites this paper as Meade and Craig’s [40]
In the citing paper
“three attention check questions were included to measure the quality of responses”
From Fear of missing out, social media influencers, and the social, psychological and financial wellbeing of young consumers (2025) · cites this paper as [96]
In the citing paper
“Increased error in some population (whether systematic or random) makes measures less capable at capturing individual differences in the trait of interest in that population (see e.g., refs. 20–22; see also ref. 23).”
From Simpson’s gender-equality paradox (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“It is difficult to completely account for error (see refs. 21 and 22), but scale reliability may be used as an indication of the prevalence of quality responses.”
From Simpson’s gender-equality paradox (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“It also uses more extensive data quality controls, as recommended in ref. 22.”
From Simpson’s gender-equality paradox (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Invalid responses were excluded if there are the same responses for all items and if items receive consistent extreme values (Meade & Craig, 2012). The valid rate was 100% as a result of applying these criteria.”
From University students' Motivated Attention and use of regulation strategies on social media (2015) · cites this paper as Meade & Craig, 2012
In the citing paper
“These responses can compromise the quality and accuracy of the data, weaken the relationships among survey variables, and impact factor loading and structure”
From Measuring undergraduate students’ reliance on generative AI during problem-solving: Scale development and validation. (2025) · cites this paper as Meade & Craig, 2012
In the citing paper
“Additionally, we checked our results for responses where the first option is selected for each question [24].We did not find such cases.”
From Using AI-based coding assistants in practice: State of affairs, perceptions, and ways forward (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701575396 · Cited by 11,415
(2007) · Cited by 10,092
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
The Psychology of Survey Response
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819322 · Cited by 4,734
A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires
Hinkin, T. R. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819800100106 · Cited by 4,095
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,151
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,020
Folger, N., Brosi, P., & Stumpf-Wollersheim, J. (2021) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2021.10.005 · Cited by 25
Re-exploring entrepreneurial intentions and personality attributes during a pandemic
Cater, J. J., Young, M., Al‐Shammari, M., & James, K. W. (2021) · Journal of International Education in Business · doi:10.1108/jieb-04-2021-0050 · Cited by 28
Boekhorst, J. A., & Halinski, M. J. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2600 · Cited by 25
Nießen, D., Groskurth, K., Kemper, C. J., Rammstedt, B., & Lechner, C. M. (2022) · Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences · doi:10.1186/s42409-021-00027-6 · Cited by 23
Customer courtesy and service performance: The roles of self‐efficacy and social context
Yoon, D. J., Muir, C. P., Yoon, M. H., & Kim, E. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2625 · Cited by 25
Measuring “we‐ness” in couple relationships: A social identity approach
Cruwys, T., South, E. I., Halford, W. K., Murray, J. A., & Fladerer, M. P. (2022) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12811 · Cited by 27
Is paid sick leave bad for business? A systematic review
Weerdt, C. V., Stoddard-Dare, P. A., & DeRigne, L. (2023) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.23469 · Cited by 25
Zhu, Q., Martinescu, E., Beersma, B., & Wei, F. (2023) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267231165885 · Cited by 24
Cognition in context: Social inclusion attenuates the psychological boundary between self and other
Bentley, S. V., Greenaway, K. H., & Haslam, S. A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.008 · Cited by 27
Social Capital Accumulation in Location-Based Mobile Game Playing: A Multiple-Process Approach
Sung, H.-T., Sigerson, L., & Cheng, C. (2017) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0222 · Cited by 25
Understanding Franchisee Performance: The Role of Personal and Contextual Resources
Parker, S. L., Cutts, S., Nathan, G., & Zacher, H. (2018) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9558-5 · Cited by 27
Advancing and Evaluating IRT Model Data Fit Indices in Organizational Research
Nye, C. D., Joo, S., Zhang, B., & Stark, S. E. (2019) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428119833158 · Cited by 25
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms and Reckless Behaviors: A Network Analysis Approach
Armour, C., Greene, T., Contractor, A. A., Weiss, N. H., Dixon–Gordon, K. L., & Ross, J. (2020) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22487 · Cited by 26
“Beware the young doctor and the old barber”: Development and validation of a job age-type spectrum
Reeves, M., Fritzsche, B., Marcus, J., Smith, N. A., & Ng, Y.-L. (2021) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103616 · Cited by 17
Bulut, H. C., & Bulut, O. (2022) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101126 · Cited by 24
Heinemann, H., Mussel, P., & Schäpers, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003866 · Cited by 32
Bargmann, C., & Kauffeld, S. (2023) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00983-w · Cited by 24
Understanding and measuring young people’s sustainability actions
Oinonen, I., & Paloniemi, R. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102124 · Cited by 31
Yang, L., Bauer, K., Li, X., & Hinz, O. F. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03918 · Cited by 39
Schick, M. R., Weiss, N. H., Contractor, A. A., Dixon–Gordon, K. L., & Spillane, N. S. (2019) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2019.1572759 · Cited by 24
Dalal, D. K., Zhu, X., Rangel, B., Boyce, A. S., & Lobene, E. V. (2019) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-019-09655-6 · Cited by 26
Lyons, B. J., Lynch, J. W., & Johnson, T. D. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.001 · Cited by 26
Linking alcohol-specific masculine norms and drinking behavior among Latino men.
Perrotte, J. K., Zamboanga, B. L., & Kearns, N. T. (2019) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/men0000252 · Cited by 24
Karpińska-Krakowiak, M., Skowron, Ł., & Ivanov, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145524 · Cited by 28
Contractor, A. A., Weiss, N. H., & Forkus, S. R. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23046 · Cited by 25
A Cheating Mood: The Emotional and Psychological Benefits of Cheating in Single-Player Games
Passmore, C. J., Miller, M. K., Liu, J., Phillips, C. J., & Mandryk, R. L. (2020) · Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · doi:10.1145/3410404.3414252 · Cited by 27
Weiss, N. H., Goncharenko, S., Raudales, A. M., Schick, M. R., & Contractor, A. A. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106777 · Cited by 24
Tu, K., Chen, S., & Mesler, R. M. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110687 · Cited by 24
Ober, T. M., Coggins, M. R., Rebouças-Ju, D., Suzuki, H., & Cheng, Y. (2021) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101988 · Cited by 27
Piumatti, G., Guttormsen, S., Zurbuchen, B., Abbiati, M., Gerbase, M. W., & Baroffio, A. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02809-2 · Cited by 28
Parenting despite discrimination: Does racial identity matter?
Holloway, K., & Varner, F. A. (2021) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/cdp0000452 · Cited by 24
Verifying online information: Development and validation of a self-report scale
Tifferet, S. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101788 · Cited by 24
Zimmermann, V., Marky, K., & Renaud, K. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2042384 · Cited by 27
Mendoza, N. B., Cheng, E. C. K., & Yan, Z. (2022) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101139 · Cited by 24
Random Responders in the TIMSS 2015 Student Questionnaire: A Threat to Validity?
van Laar, S., & Braeken, J. (2022) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12317 · Cited by 24
Elevated levels of hoarding in ADHD: A special link with inattention
Morein‐Zamir, S., Kasese, M., Chamberlain, S. R., & Trachtenberg, E. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.12.024 · Cited by 26
Krasko, J., Intelisano, S., & Luhmann, M. (2022) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-022-00541-2 · Cited by 23
Trust in COVID ‐19 public health information
Verma, N., Fleischmann, K. R., Zhou, L., Xie, B., Lee, M. K., Rich, K., Shiroma, K., Jia, C., & Zimmerman, T. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24712 · Cited by 25
When subordinates do not follow: A typology of subordinate resistance as perceived by leaders
van der Velde, A., & Gerpott, F. H. (2023) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101687 · Cited by 29
Benevolent Sexism and the Gender Gap in Startup Evaluation
Nguyen, N., Hideg, I., Engel, Y., & Godart, F. C. (2023) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587231178865 · Cited by 26
Question Order Affects the Measurement of Bullying Victimization Among Middle School Students
Huang, F. L., & Cornell, D. G. (2015) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164415622664 · Cited by 24
How perceived riskiness influences the selection of women and men as senior leaders
van Esch, C., Hopkins, M. M., O'Neil, D. A., & Bilimoria, D. (2018) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21902 · Cited by 29
Abotalebi, E., Ferguson, M. R., Mohamed, M., & Scott, D. M. (2018) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-018-9952-x · Cited by 24
Koivisto, J., Malik, A. N., Gurkan, B., & Hamari, J. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.216 · Cited by 24
Conijn, J. M., Franz, G., Emons, W. H. M., de Beurs, E., & Carlier, I. V. E. (2019) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1563520 · Cited by 24
Narcissism and perceived power in romantic relationships
Vrabel, J. K., Zeigler‐Hill, V., Lehtman, M. J., & Hernández, K. D. P. (2019) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407519858685 · Cited by 33
Lu, R., Wang, Z., Lin, X., & Guo, L. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16173094 · Cited by 25
Contractor, A. A., Weiss, N. H., Kearns, N. T., Caldas, S. V., & Dixon–Gordon, K. L. (2019) · International Journal of Stress Management · doi:10.1037/str0000145 · Cited by 24
Weiss, N. H., Forkus, S. R., Raudales, A. M., Schick, M. R., & Contractor, A. A. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106322 · Cited by 25
Understanding student simultaneous smartphone use in learning settings: A conceptual framework
Fu, E., Gao, Q., Wei, C., Chen, Q., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12471 · Cited by 33
Allodynia and Disability in Migraine: The Mediating Role of Stress
Polk, A. N., Protti, T. A., & Smitherman, T. A. (2020) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.14012 · Cited by 27
Tawa, J. (2017) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/cdp0000151 · Cited by 25
Wrzus, C., & Neubauer, A. B. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vmr8q · Cited by 26
Does “putting on your thinking cap” reduce myside bias in evaluation of scientific evidence?
Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2019) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2018.1548379 · Cited by 35
Hirschfeld, G. H. F., & Thielsch, M. T. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · doi:10.1007/s13753-022-00424-3 · Cited by 23
Ni, X., Zhu, X., Bian, W., Li, J., Chen, P., & Pan, C. (2023) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-07-2023-0400 · Cited by 26
Stein, M., Kühner, C., Katz, I. M., & Zacher, H. (2025) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2025.2468649 · Cited by 23
Thai, S., & Lockwood, P. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215588094 · Cited by 23
Finn, E., Morrison, T. G., & McGuire, B. E. (2017) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnx056 · Cited by 24
When Home Is Where the Harm Is: Family Betrayal and Posttraumatic Outcomes in Young Adulthood
Delker, B. C., Smith, C. P., Rosenthal, M. N., Bernstein, R. E., & Freyd, J. J. (2017) · Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926771.2017.1382639 · Cited by 25
Trait Mindfulness and Relationship Satisfaction: The Role of Forgiveness Among Couples
Roberts, K., Jaurequi, M. E., Kimmes, J. G., & Selice, L. (2020) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12440 · Cited by 30
Forgiveness and attribution: when abusive supervision enhances performance
Yang, J., Liu, Y., Stackhouse, M. R. D., & Wang, W. (2020) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-04-2019-0239 · Cited by 23
Cognitive Effects of Inattentive Responding in an MTurk Sample
Pyo, J., & Maxfield, M. G. (2021) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12954 · Cited by 23
Partsch, M. V., Bluemke, M., & Lechner, C. M. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070211017760 · Cited by 23
Murray, S., Augustyniak, M., Murase, J. E., Fischer‐Betz, R., Nelson‐Piercy, C., Peniuta, M., & Vlaev, I. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043960 · Cited by 23
Bentley, J. R., Robinson, J. L., & Zanhour, M. (2021) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-11-2020-0561 · Cited by 24
The differential relation of trauma types with negative and positive emotion dysregulation
Berfield, J. B., Goncharenko, S., Forkus, S. R., Contractor, A. A., & Weiss, N. H. (2021) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2021.1964072 · Cited by 25
Sha, Y., Dong, W., Tang, W., Zheng, L., Huang, X., Muessig, K. E., & Tucker, J. D. (2021) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06782-5 · Cited by 30
Changes in Spiritual Practices and Relational Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Kelley, H. H., Dollahite, D. C., James, S. L., & Marks, L. D. (2022) · Marriage & Family Review · doi:10.1080/01494929.2021.2022563 · Cited by 23
Developing A Model of News Literacy in Early Adolescents: A Survey Study
Tamboer, S. L., Kleemans, M., Molenaar, I., & Bosse, T. (2022) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2048027 · Cited by 23
Leader expectations facilitate employee pro‐environmental behavior
Nie, Q., Peng, J., & Yu, G. (2022) · Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12500 · Cited by 22
Can we do more than “bounce back”? Transilience in the face of climate change risks
Nasi, V. L., Jans, L., & Steg, L. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101947 · Cited by 25
A nomological network for misophonia in two German samples using the S-Five model for misophonia
Remmert, N., Jebens, A., Gruzman, R., Gregory, J. E., & Vitoratou, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902807 · Cited by 32
Hu, X., Yan, H., Jiang, Z., & Yeo, G. (2023) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103911 · Cited by 27
Schneider, T. J., Goffin, R. D., & Daljeet, K. N. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.026 · Cited by 23
Investigating the strategic antecedents of agility in humanitarian logistics
L’Hermitte, C., Brooks, B., Bowles, M., & Tatham, P. H. (2016) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/disa.12220 · Cited by 24
“1-in-X” bias: “1-in-X” format causes overestimation of health-related risks.
Sirota, M., Juanchich, M., & Bonnefon, J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000190 · Cited by 23
Using surveytainment to counter declining survey data quality
Kostyk, A., Zhou, W., & Hyman, M. R. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.024 · Cited by 25
Perrotte, J. K., Martin, J. L., & Piña‐Watson, B. (2020) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2019.1705836 · Cited by 23
Oxytocin and the stress buffering effect of social company: a genetic study in daily life
Sicorello, M., Dieckmann, L., Moser, D., Lux, V., Luhmann, M., Schlotz, W., & Kumsta, R. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa034 · Cited by 26
Wagner, U., & Charinsarn, A. R. (2020) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2020.1741483 · Cited by 24
Matosas-López, L., Leguey-Galán, S., & Doncel, L. M. (2019) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.16.3.9 · Cited by 25
(2013) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e570072013-004 · Cited by 23
Customer Service Chatbots: Anthropomorphism, Adoption and Word of Mouth
Sheehan, B. T. (2018) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.121188 · Cited by 23
Remote Assessment of Depression Using Digital Biomarkers From Cognitive Tasks
Mandryk, R. L., Birk, M. V., Vedress, S., Wiley, K., Reid, E., Berger, P., & Frommel, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767507 · Cited by 23
Chen, Q., Chen, M., Lin, L., & Bai, X. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14090734 · Cited by 22
Consistency of self‐reported drug use among electronic dance music party attendees
Palamar, J. J., Le, A., Acosta, P., & Cleland, C. M. (2019) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.12982 · Cited by 22
Henninger, M., & Plieninger, H. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191119900003 · Cited by 24
Watkins, T., & Umphress, E. E. (2020) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12384 · Cited by 23
A pace of life indicator. Development and validation of a General Acceleration Scale
Bergener, J., & Santarius, T. (2021) · Time & Society · doi:10.1177/0961463x20980645 · Cited by 21
Neilson, E. C., Smith, L., Davis, K. C., & George, W. H. (2021) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/vio0000381 · Cited by 22
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Perceived Risk of HIV Scale in Brazilian Portuguese
Torres, T. S., Luz, P. M., Marins, L. M. S., Bezerra, D. R. B., Almeida-Brasil, C. C., Veloso, V. G., Grinsztejn, B. G. J., Harel, D., & Thombs, B. D. (2021) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-021-01760-6 · Cited by 22
Simpson, L. E., Raudales, A. M., Reyes, M. E., Sullivan, T. P., & Weiss, N. H. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211006371 · Cited by 22
Wang, Z., Yang, X., Chan, A. P. C., & Liu, J. (2021) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.06.002 · Cited by 22
Moral disengagement mechanisms predict cyber aggression among emerging adults
Nocera, T. R., Dahlen, E. R., Poor, A., Strowd, J., Dortch, A., & Overloop, E. V. (2022) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2022-1-6 · Cited by 30
COVID-19 vaccine behaviors and intentions among a national sample of United States adults ages 18–45
Brownstein, N. C., Reddy, H., Whiting, J., Kasting, M. L., Head, K. J., Vadaparampil, S. T., Giuliano, A. R., Gwede, C. K., Meade, C. D., & Christy, S. M. (2022) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107038 · Cited by 21
Tolentino, L. R., Lajom, J. A. L., Sibunruang, H., & Garcia, P. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111664 · Cited by 22
To What Degree Does Rapid Guessing Distort Aggregated Test Scores? A Meta-analytic Investigation
Rios, J. A., Deng, J., & Ihlenfeldt, S. D. (2022) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2022.2110465 · Cited by 22
The rise and fall of job insecurity during a pandemic: The role of habitual coping
Khawli, E. E., Keller, A. C., Agostini, M., Gützkow, B., Kreienkamp, J., Leander, N. P., & Scheibe, S. (2022) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103792 · Cited by 24
Gajendran, R. S., Mistry, S., & Tangirala, S. (2022) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12545 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-455
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2116323796
- Cited by
- 3,865
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 604 · 2025: 481 · 2024: 362 · 2023: 355 · 2022: 405 · 2021: 383 · 2020: 300 · 2019: 247 · 2018: 206 · 2017: 195 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 209.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Keywords
- survey data quality, reaction time (psychology), data simulation, online surveys
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Research Design, Logistic Models, Internet, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
