Cited by 40Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSmoking Behavior and CessationMedia Influence and Health

The interactive effect of mortality reminders and tobacco craving on smoking topography

Arndt, Jamie, Vail, Kenneth E., Cox, Cathy R., Goldenberg, Jamie L., Piasecki, Thomas M., Gibbons, Frederick X.·2013·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although fatal consequences of smoking are often highlighted in health communications, the question of how awareness of death affects actual smoking behavior has yet to be addressed. Two experiments informed by the terror management health model were conducted to examine this issue. Previous research suggests that the effects of mortality reminders on health-related decisions are often moderated by relevant individual difference or situational variables. Thus, a moderated effect was hypothesized here, and cigarette cravings were tentatively explored in this regard. METHODS: In both studies, relatively light smokers completed a brief questionnaire about cigarette cravings, were reminded of their mortality or a control topic, and then smoked five puffs from a cigarette while the topography (i.e., volume, duration, and velocity) of their inhalations was recorded. RESULTS: Significant craving × death reminder interactions emerged in both experiments. After reminders of mortality, stronger cravings predicted greater smoking intensity. Further, reminders of mortality increased smoking intensity for those with stronger cravings in both studies, and there was also some indication that mortality reminders decreased smoking intensity for those with weaker cravings. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are limitations in the present research's utilization of light smokers as opposed to heavy smokers, these findings indicate a nuanced effect of mortality reminders on smoking intensity and suggest that careful consideration needs to be given to when and how reminders of death are used in communications about smoking. The discussion also highlights the benefits of social psychologically informed theory for understanding health and smoking behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029201

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arndt, J., Vail, K. E., Cox, C. R., Goldenberg, J. L., Piasecki, T. M., & Gibbons, F. X.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
525-532
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2322885420
Cited by
40
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA09658)
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
cigarette craving, smoking topography, smoking intensity, terror management theory, death awareness, health communication, light smokers, moderated effects, smoking behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Reminder Systems, Young Adult, Health Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review