Cited by 114Aging and Gerontology ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

Life contexts make a difference: Emotional stability in younger and older adults.

Open access
Brose, Annette, Scheibe, Susanne, Schmiedek, Florian·2013·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Emotional stability, as indicated by low affect variability and low affective reactivity to daily events, for example, tends to increase across the adult life span. This study investigated a contextual explanation for such age differences, relating affect variability and affective reactivity to age-group-specific life contexts. A sample of 101 younger and 103 older adults reported daily stressors and negative affect across 100 days. Compared with younger adults, older adults (a) experienced fewer stressors overall, (b) had less heterogeneous stressor profiles, and (c) reported that stressors had less impact on daily routines. As expected, these contextual factors were relevant for interindividual differences in emotional stability. Multiple regression analyses revealed that reduced affect variability and affective reactivity in older adults were associated with these age-group specific life contexts. Moreover, matching younger and older adults on the contextual factors to explore the effects of context on age-group differences further provided support for the (partially) contextual explanation of age differences in emotional stability. Matched subgroups of younger and older adults that were comparable on contextual variables were identified. Affective variability, but not affective reactivity, was more similar in the matched subsamples than in the total samples of younger and older adults. We conclude that contexts in which affective experiences emerge require more attention when aiming to explain interindividual and age group differences in emotional stability. Moreover, future studies need to disentangle the extent to which contexts interact with active self-regulatory processes to shape affective experiences across adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030047

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies of intra-individual emotion variability fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically control for it.

    “most studies of intra-individual emotion variability simply fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically “control” for it20–28.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brose, A., Scheibe, S., & Schmiedek, F.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2013
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
148-159
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2132476128
Cited by
114
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Max Planck Society
  • German Federal Ministry for Education and Research
  • German Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
emotional stability, affect variability, emotional reactivity, age differences, older adults, young adults, life context, daily hassles, negative affect, self-regulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Individuality, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review