Life contexts make a difference: Emotional stability in younger and older adults.
Open accessAbstract
Emotional stability, as indicated by low affect variability and low affective reactivity to daily events, for example, tends to increase across the adult life span. This study investigated a contextual explanation for such age differences, relating affect variability and affective reactivity to age-group-specific life contexts. A sample of 101 younger and 103 older adults reported daily stressors and negative affect across 100 days. Compared with younger adults, older adults (a) experienced fewer stressors overall, (b) had less heterogeneous stressor profiles, and (c) reported that stressors had less impact on daily routines. As expected, these contextual factors were relevant for interindividual differences in emotional stability. Multiple regression analyses revealed that reduced affect variability and affective reactivity in older adults were associated with these age-group specific life contexts. Moreover, matching younger and older adults on the contextual factors to explore the effects of context on age-group differences further provided support for the (partially) contextual explanation of age differences in emotional stability. Matched subgroups of younger and older adults that were comparable on contextual variables were identified. Affective variability, but not affective reactivity, was more similar in the matched subsamples than in the total samples of younger and older adults. We conclude that contexts in which affective experiences emerge require more attention when aiming to explain interindividual and age group differences in emotional stability. Moreover, future studies need to disentangle the extent to which contexts interact with active self-regulatory processes to shape affective experiences across adulthood.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies of intra-individual emotion variability fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically control for it.
“most studies of intra-individual emotion variability simply fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically “control” for it20–28.”
From Little evidence for sex or ovarian hormone influences on affective variability (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165 · Cited by 5,377 · see citing works
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.224 · Cited by 4,671 · see citing works
Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.23 · Cited by 3,401 · see citing works
John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2004) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00298.x · Cited by 2,381 · see citing works
Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 · Cited by 1,806 · see citing works
Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling
Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Brooks, K. P., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0021285 · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
Self-citationEmotion Regulation in Older Age
Urry, H. L., & Gross, J. J. (2010) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721410388395 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Emotional Aging: Recent Findings and Future Trends
Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp132 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Self-citationDohrenwend, B. P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.477 · Cited by 601 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, reactivity varies by stressor type (Bolger et al., 1989), and stressor severity varies across situations within specific stressor types (also discussed as intraevent or intracategory variability; Almeida, Stawski, & Cichy, 2010; Dohrenwend, 2006).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Processes of Personality Development in Adulthood: The TESSERA Framework
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316652279 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Kuppens, P., & Verduyn, P. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.004 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
A coordinated analysis of variance in affect in daily life
Scott, S. B., Sliwinski, M. J., Zawadzki, M., Stawski, R. S., Kim, J., Marcusson-Clavertz, D., Lanza, S. T., Conroy, D. E., Buxton, O., Almeida, D. M., et al. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191118799460 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Kuba, K., & Scheibe, S. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0040149 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationLittle evidence for sex or ovarian hormone influences on affective variability
Weigard, A., Loviska, A. M., & Beltz, A. M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-00143-7 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Thorson, K. R., & West, T. V. (2018) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.004 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brose, A., Scheibe, S., & Schmiedek, F.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-159
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W2132476128
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max Planck Society
- German Federal Ministry for Education and Research
- German Research Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- emotional stability, affect variability, emotional reactivity, age differences, older adults, young adults, life context, daily hassles, negative affect, self-regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Individuality, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review