Cited by 30Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Sleep can eliminate list-method directed forgetting.

Abel, Magdalena, Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T.·2013·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Recent work suggests a link between sleep and memory consolidation, indicating that sleep in comparison to wakefulness stabilizes memories. However, relatively little is known about how sleep affects forgetting. Here we examined whether sleep influences directed forgetting, the finding that people can intentionally forget obsolete memories when cued to do so. We applied the list-method directed forgetting task and assessed memory performance after 3 delay intervals. Directed forgetting was present after a short 20-min delay and after a 12-hr delay filled with diurnal wakefulness; in contrast, the forgetting was absent after a 12-hr delay that included regular nocturnal sleep. Successful directed forgetting after a delay thus can depend on whether sleep or wakefulness follows upon encoding: When wakefulness follows upon encoding, the forgetting can be successful; when sleep follows upon encoding, no forgetting may arise. Connections of the results to recent studies on the interplay between forgetting and sleep are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030529

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep counteracted instructed directed forgetting effects.

    “However, sleep also appeared to counteracted instructed, i.e., “directed” forgetting effects in these studies (2,330,381).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [2]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abel, M., & Bäuml, K.-H. T.
Affiliations
University of Regensburg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2013
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
946-952
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2066905626
Cited by
30
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
directed forgetting, sleep, memory consolidation, forgetting, memory encoding, wakefulness, intentional forgetting
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Mental Recall, Sleep, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review