Volunteering by older adults and risk of mortality: A meta-analysis.
Abstract
Organizational volunteering has been touted as an effective strategy for older adults to help themselves while helping others. Extending previous reviews, we carried out a meta-analysis of the relation between organizational volunteering by late-middle-aged and older adults (minimum age = 55 years old) and risk of mortality. We focused on unadjusted effect sizes (i.e., bivariate relations), adjusted effect sizes (i.e., controlling for other variables such as health), and interaction effect sizes (e.g., the joint effect of volunteering and religiosity). For unadjusted effect sizes, on average, volunteering reduced mortality risk by 47%, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 38% to 55%. For adjusted effect sizes, on average, volunteering reduced mortality risk by 24%, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 16% to 31%. For interaction effect sizes, we found preliminary support that as public religiosity increases, the inverse relation between volunteering and mortality risk becomes stronger. The discussion identifies several unresolved issues and directions for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Volunteering is associated with beneficial mental, social, and physical health outcomes, including higher wellbeing, lower distress, greater social connectedness, better functional health, and, in some longitudinal studies, lower mortality risk.
“A growing body of research indicates that volunteering is associated with beneficial mental, social, and physical health outcomes, including higher wellbeing, lower distress, greater social connectedness, better functional health, and, in some longitudinal studies, lower mortality risk (21–24).”
From Volunteerism as a multidimensional form of human prosocial engagement (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657355 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Brown, S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., & Smith, D. M. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14461 · Cited by 1,142 · see citing works
Self-citationHealth Benefits of Volunteering in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study
Piliavin, J. A., & Siegl, E. (2007) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650704800408 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Does social participation by the elderly reduce mortality and cognitive impairment?
Hsu, H. C. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860701366335 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Motives for volunteering are associated with mortality risk in older adults.
Konrath, S., Fuhrel-Forbis, A., Lou, A., & Brown, S. (2012) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025226 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Informal Caregiving and Its Impact on Health: A Reappraisal From Population-Based Studies
Roth, D. L., Fredman, L., & Haley, W. E. (2015) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnu177 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
Cohen, R., Bavishi, C., & Rozanski, A. (2016) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000274 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Methodological quality is underrated in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health psychology
Oliveras, I., Losilla, J.-M., & Vives, J. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.002 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Volunteerism as a multidimensional form of human prosocial engagement
Sarid, O. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1908108
- Authors
- Okun, M. A., Yeung, E. W., & Brown, S.
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 564-577
- ISSN
- 1939-1498
- 0882-7974
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review