Cited by 269Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringAging and Gerontology ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Motives for volunteering are associated with mortality risk in older adults.

Konrath, Sara, Fuhrel-Forbis, Andrea, Lou, Alina, Brown, Stephanie·2012·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of motives for volunteering on respondents' mortality risk 4 years later. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis was used to examine whether motives for volunteering predicted later mortality risk, above and beyond volunteering itself, in older adults from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. Covariates included age, gender, socioeconomic variables, physical, mental, and cognitive health, health risk behaviors, personality traits, received social support, and actual volunteering behavior. RESULTS: Replicating prior work, respondents who volunteered were at lower risk for mortality 4 years later, especially those who volunteered more regularly and frequently. However, volunteering behavior was not always beneficially related to mortality risk: Those who volunteered for self-oriented reasons had a mortality risk similar to nonvolunteers. Those who volunteered for other-oriented reasons had a decreased mortality risk, even in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the existing literature on the powerful effects of social interactions on health and is the first study to our knowledge to examine the effect of motives on volunteers' subsequent mortality. Volunteers live longer than nonvolunteers, but this is only true if they volunteer for other-oriented reasons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025226

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konrath, S., Fuhrel-Forbis, A., Lou, A., & Brown, S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2012-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
87-96
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2116685871
Cited by
268
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
50.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
volunteering, mortality risk, older adults, longevity, Wisconsin Longitudinal Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mortality, Motivation, Risk, Social Support, Volunteers, Wisconsin, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review