Cited by 420Psychometric Methodologies and TestingGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationPsychological and Educational Research Studies

Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages.

Marsh, Herbert W., Vallerand, Robert J., Lafrenière, Marc-André K., Parker, Philip, Morin, Alexandre J. S., Carbonneau, Noémie, Jowett, Sophia, Bureau, Julien S. +4 more·2013·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The passion scale, based on the dualistic model of passion, measures 2 distinct types of passion: Harmonious and obsessive passions are predictive of adaptive and less adaptive outcomes, respectively. In a substantive-methodological synergy, we evaluate the construct validity (factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity) of Passion Scale responses (N = 3,571). The exploratory structural equation model fit to the data was substantially better than the confirmatory factor analysis solution, and resulted in better differentiated (less correlated) factors. Results from a 13-model taxonomy of measurement invariance supported complete invariance (factor loadings, factor correlations, item uniquenesses, item intercepts, and latent means) over language (French vs. English; the instrument was originally devised in French, then translated into English) and gender. Strong measurement partial invariance over 5 passion activity groups (leisure, sport, social, work, education) indicates that the same set of items is appropriate for assessing passion across a wide variety of activities--a previously untested, implicit assumption that greatly enhances practical utility. Support was found for the convergent and discriminant validity of the harmonious and obsessive passion scales, based on a set of validity correlates: life satisfaction, rumination, conflict, time investment, activity liking and valuation, and perceiving the activity as a passion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0032573

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsh, H. W., Vallerand, R. J., Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Parker, P., Morin, A. J. S., Carbonneau, N., Jowett, S., Bureau, J. S., Fernet, C., Guay, F., Salah Abduljabbar, A., & Paquet, Y.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • University of Reunion Island (RE)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2013-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
796-809
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2083282455
Cited by
420
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6
FWCI
30.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
passion, harmonious passion, obsessive passion, dualistic model of passion, Passion Scale, construct validity, measurement invariance, psychometric invariance, language invariance, gender invariance, activity types, leisure, sport, work, life satisfaction, rumination, time investment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Emotions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Obsessive Behavior, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review