Cited by 135Action Observation and SynchronizationSocial Power and Status DynamicsFree Will and Agency

Power changes how the brain responds to others.

Hogeveen, Jeremy, Inzlicht, Michael, Obhi, Sukhvinder S.·2014·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Power dynamics are a ubiquitous feature of human social life, yet little is known about how power is implemented in the brain. Motor resonance is the activation of similar brain networks when acting and when watching someone else act, and is thought to be implemented, in part, by the human mirror system. We investigated the effects of power on motor resonance during an action observation task. Separate groups of participants underwent a high-, neutral, or low-power induction priming procedure, prior to observing the actions of another person. During observation, motor resonance was determined with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) via measures of motor cortical output. High-power participants demonstrated lower levels of resonance than low-power participants, suggesting reduced mirroring of other people in those with power. These differences suggest that decreased motor resonance to others' actions might be one of the neural mechanisms underlying power-induced asymmetries in processing our social interaction partners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033477

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The exercise of power increases testosterone and decreases oxytocin, which in turn leads to higher aggression and lower empathy and prosocial behaviour.

    “Furthermore, the exercise of power increases levels of testosterone while decreasing oxytocin which in turn leads to higher levels of aggression and lower levels of empathy and prosocial behaviour (Israel et al. 2009; Owen 2012; Hogeveen et al. 2014; Robertson 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogeveen, J., Inzlicht, M., & Obhi, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2014
Volume
143
Issue
2
Pages
755-762
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2116794299
Cited by
135
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11
FWCI
18.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  • Engineering Research Council
  • Social Science and Humanities Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
power, motor resonance, action observation, mirror system, social cognition, motor cortex, social asymmetry, transcranial magnetic stimulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Power, Psychological, Social Behavior, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review