Cited by 347Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition

Open access
Brass, Marcel, Ruby, Perrine, Spengler, Stephanie·2009·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

There is converging evidence that the observation of an action activates a corresponding motor representation in the observer through a 'mirror-matching' mechanism. However, research on such 'shared representations' of perception and action has widely neglected the question of how we can distinguish our own motor intentions from externally triggered motor representations. By investigating the inhibition of imitative response tendencies, as an index for the control of shared representations, we can show that self-other distinction plays a fundamental role in the control of shared representations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that overlapping brain activations can be found in the anterior fronto-median cortex (aFMC) and the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) area for the control of shared representations and complex social-cognitive tasks, such as mental state attribution. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, we functionally dissociate the roles of TPJ and aFMC during the control of shared representations. Finally, we propose a hypothesis stating that the control of shared representations might be the missing link between functions of the mirror system and mental state attribution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2009.0066

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mechanisms that inhibit imitation are considered at least partly separate from general inhibitory control.

    “Imitation-inhibition and general inhibition processes are thus thought to be at least partially distinct.[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]”
  • The temporoparietal junction may play a crucial role in self-other distinction processes.

    “It has been suggested that the TPJ may play a crucial role in SOD processes (Brass et al., 2005(Brass et al., , 2009)).”
  • Repeated coupling between the sensory image of an action and the execution of the same may evoke a sense of motoric self-other overlap via strengthened shared motor representations.

    “Repeated coupling between the sensory image of an action and the execution of the same, may evoke a sense of motoric self-other overlap between one's own movements and movement intentions and the other's movements, via strengthened shared motor representations (Brass et al., 2009;Prinz, 2005).”
  • Brain imaging studies point to a role of the temporoparietal junction during interference control of overlapping action perception and execution, specifically the inhibition of imitation.

    “This finding is corroborated by brain imaging studies, pointing to a role of the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) during interference control of overlapping action perception and execution, specifically the inhibition of imitation.”
  • The absence of mPFC engagement for imitation control across studies is inconsistent with the hypothesis that a specific neural system related to social cognition is also engaged during the inhibition of automatic imitation.

    “An absence of mPFC engagement for imitation control across studies is thus inconsistent with the hypothesis that a specific neural system related to social cognition is also engaged during the inhibition of automatic imitation (Brass et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brass, M., Ruby, P., & Spengler, S.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Brass, Marcel
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2009-08-27
Volume
364
Issue
1528
Pages
2359-2367
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2155694177
Cited by
347
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
FWCI
16.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
mirror system, shared representations, imitation, self-other distinction, mental state attribution, social cognition, temporoparietal junction, motor representations, functional dissociation
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Activity, Neural Inhibition, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Social Behavior, Temporal Lobe, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review