Cited by 219Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The nondiscriminating heart: Lovingkindness meditation training decreases implicit intergroup bias.

Kang, Yoona, Gray, Jeremy R., Dovidio, John F.·2014·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Although meditation is increasingly accepted as having personal benefits, less is known about the broader impact of meditation on social and intergroup relations. We tested the effect of lovingkindness meditation training on improving implicit attitudes toward members of 2 stigmatized social outgroups: Blacks and homeless people. Healthy non-Black, nonhomeless adults (N = 101) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: 6-week lovingkindness practice, 6-week lovingkindness discussion (a closely matched active control), or waitlist control. Decreases in implicit bias against stigmatized outgroups (as measured by Implicit Association Test) were observed only in the lovingkindness practice condition. Reduced psychological stress mediated the effect of lovingkindness practice on implicit bias against homeless people, but it did not mediate the reduced bias against Black people. These results suggest that lovingkindness meditation can improve automatically activated, implicit attitudes toward stigmatized social groups and that this effect occurs through distinctive mechanisms for different stigmatized social groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034150

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All except one of the studies where the intervention was taught by a person used a meditation teacher who was a named author in the study (information unavailable for two studies).

    “All except one of the studies41, where the intervention was taught by a person, used a meditation teacher that was a named author in the study (information unavailable for two studies24,25).”
  • Only rarely do studies try to look at underpinning mechanisms, such as the role of meditation in increasing empathic accuracy or in decreasing psychological stress.

    “Only rarely do studies try to look at underpinning mechanisms, such as the role of meditation in increasing empathic accuracy43 or in decreasing psychological stress41.”
  • Another study engaged an external instructor who was not connected to the study in any other way.

    “and another study engaged an external instructor who was not connected to the study in any other way41.”
  • The research literature tends to swiftly reference the health benefits of meditation and/or mention the alleged prosocial effects of meditation in the Buddhist tradition.

    “The research literature tends to swiftly reference the health benefits of meditation and/or mention the alleged prosocial effects of meditation in the Buddhist tradition36,38,41.”
  • The results either failed to show that the mechanism in question played any significant role or it only worked partially (reducing psychological distress when dealing with prejudice regarding homeless but not Black people).

    “However, the results either failed to show that the mechanism in question played any significant role or it only worked partially (reducing psychological distress when dealing with prejudice regarding homeless but not Black people)41.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 219

Authors
Kang, Y., Gray, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2014-06
Volume
143
Issue
3
Pages
1306-1313
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2034850886
Cited by
219
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
implicit bias, intergroup bias, Black people, homeless people, Implicit Association Test, psychological stress, implicit attitudes, meditation training
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Prejudice, Random Allocation, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review