The nondiscriminating heart: Lovingkindness meditation training decreases implicit intergroup bias.
Abstract
Although meditation is increasingly accepted as having personal benefits, less is known about the broader impact of meditation on social and intergroup relations. We tested the effect of lovingkindness meditation training on improving implicit attitudes toward members of 2 stigmatized social outgroups: Blacks and homeless people. Healthy non-Black, nonhomeless adults (N = 101) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: 6-week lovingkindness practice, 6-week lovingkindness discussion (a closely matched active control), or waitlist control. Decreases in implicit bias against stigmatized outgroups (as measured by Implicit Association Test) were observed only in the lovingkindness practice condition. Reduced psychological stress mediated the effect of lovingkindness practice on implicit bias against homeless people, but it did not mediate the reduced bias against Black people. These results suggest that lovingkindness meditation can improve automatically activated, implicit attitudes toward stigmatized social groups and that this effect occurs through distinctive mechanisms for different stigmatized social groups.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All except one of the studies where the intervention was taught by a person used a meditation teacher who was a named author in the study (information unavailable for two studies).
“All except one of the studies41, where the intervention was taught by a person, used a meditation teacher that was a named author in the study (information unavailable for two studies24,25).”
From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Only rarely do studies try to look at underpinning mechanisms, such as the role of meditation in increasing empathic accuracy or in decreasing psychological stress.
“Only rarely do studies try to look at underpinning mechanisms, such as the role of meditation in increasing empathic accuracy43 or in decreasing psychological stress41.”
From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Another study engaged an external instructor who was not connected to the study in any other way.
“and another study engaged an external instructor who was not connected to the study in any other way41.”
From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
The research literature tends to swiftly reference the health benefits of meditation and/or mention the alleged prosocial effects of meditation in the Buddhist tradition.
“The research literature tends to swiftly reference the health benefits of meditation and/or mention the alleged prosocial effects of meditation in the Buddhist tradition36,38,41.”
From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
The results either failed to show that the mechanism in question played any significant role or it only worked partially (reducing psychological distress when dealing with prejudice regarding homeless but not Black people).
“However, the results either failed to show that the mechanism in question played any significant role or it only worked partially (reducing psychological distress when dealing with prejudice regarding homeless but not Black people)41.”
From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
All 7 low-risk studies that measured observable prosocial outcomes reported improvements following meditation.
“There were 7 low-risk studies that measured observable pro-social outcomes and all of them reported improvements following meditation (Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2014; Kemeny et al., 2012; Mascaro, Riling, Negi, & Raison, 2013; Rosenberg et al., 2015; Schonert-Reichl et al., 2015; Weng et al., 2013; Weng, Fox, Hessenthaler, Stodola, & Davidson, 2015).”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2014
Six of these studies conducted formal mediation analyses.
“Six of these studies conducted formal mediation analyses (Ashar et al., 2016; Hutcherson et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2014; Oman et al., 2010; Kok et al., 2013; Shapiro et al., 1998).”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Kang et al., 2014
Three low-risk studies did not find support for subjective improvements.
“Three low-risk studies did not find support for subjective improvements (Kang et al., 2014; Keefe, 1979; Rosenberg et al., 2015).”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Kang et al., 2014
Decreased stress mediated the effect of LKM on bias.
“decreased stress mediated the effect of LKM on bias (Kang et al., 2014);”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Kang et al., 2014
Some studies directly tested self-focused emotional mechanisms as mediators of meditation training on prosocial outcomes and found significant indirect effects, suggesting that meditation leads to improvements in individuals' own socio-emotional functioning and, thereby, improvements in prosocial outcomes.
“Some studies directly tested self-focused emotional mechanisms as mediators of meditation training on pro-social outcomes and found significant indirect effects, suggesting that meditation leads to improvements in individuals own socio-emotional functioning and, thereby, improvements in pro-social outcomes (Ashar et al., 2016; Hutcherson et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2014; Kok et al., 2013; Shapiro”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Kang et al., 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 219
- Authors
- Kang, Y., Gray, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1306-1313
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2034850886
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- implicit bias, intergroup bias, Black people, homeless people, Implicit Association Test, psychological stress, implicit attitudes, meditation training
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Prejudice, Random Allocation, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review