Cited by 56Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

DSM-5 gambling disorder: Prevalence and characteristics in a substance use disorder sample.

Open access
Rennert, Lior, Denis, Cécile, Peer, Kyle, Lynch, Kevin G., Gelernter, Joel, Kranzler, Henry R.·2014·Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) replaced the fourth edition's (DSM-IV) diagnosis of Pathological Gambling (PG) with Gambling Disorder (GD). GD differs from PG in that it requires 4 rather than 5 criteria for diagnosis and excludes the "Illegal Acts" criterion. We examined the prevalence of GD and its characteristics and validity in a substance-use disorder (SUD) sample. Participants (N = 6,613) in genetic studies of substance dependence underwent a semistructured psychiatric interview. Individuals who reported ever having gambled $10 at least monthly (n = 1,507) were the focus of the analyses. Approximately one third of acknowledged gamblers (n = 563; 8.5% of the total sample) received PG (DSM-IV) and GD (DSM-5) diagnoses and 678 (10.3% of the total) received only a DSM-5 diagnosis, representing an increase of 20.4% relative to DSM-IV. Although the 3 groups were comparable demographically, the DSM-5-Only group was intermediate between the other 2 groups on the prevalence of comorbid SUDs, the distribution of DSM-IV PG criteria endorsed, and the types of gambling reported. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that the DSM-5-Only group was more likely than the No-Diagnosis group and less likely than the Both-Diagnoses group to acknowledge a gambling problem. In conclusion, there was a high prevalence of PG in this SUD sample. Analysis of non-DSM variables suggested that the increased sensitivity of the DSM-5 GD diagnosis successfully identifies a broader set of individuals with clinically significant gambling-related problems. Prospective studies of individuals with GD are needed to validate this finding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034518

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) 1994 Washington, DC APA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rennert, L., Denis, C., Peer, K., Lynch, K. G., Gelernter, J., & Kranzler, H. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2014-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
50-56
ISSN
  • 1064-1297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2293
OpenAlex
W2035078571
Cited by
56
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 DA12690, R01 DA12849; R01 DA18432; R01 AA11330; R01 AA017535)
  • Veterans Integrated Service Networks 1 and 4
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
gambling addiction, DSM-5, DSM-IV, diagnostic criteria, prevalence, substance use disorders, comorbidities, diagnostic validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Gambling, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review