Cited by 304Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Impulsivity, personality disorders and pathological gambling severity

Open access
Steel, Zachary, Blaszczynski, Alex·1998·Addiction

Abstract

Aims. The present study seeks to replicate and expand findings from earlier studies that pathological gamblers manifest elevated traits of impulsivity. Secondly, the study aims to elucidate the relationship between impulsivity, indices reflecting severity of pathological gambling and other measures of psychopathology and personality dysfunction. Design. Case series. Participants. Eighty‐two consecutive gamblers seeking treatment for problem gambling. Setting. Impulse Disorders Research Unit, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Australia. Measurements. Semi‐structured interview designed to obtain demographic information and gambling history, the South Oaks Gambling Screen, the Eysenck Impulsivity Scale, the Personality Disorder Questionnaire‐Revised, the Beck Depression Inventory and the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Findings. Results show elevated traits of impulsivity among clinic samples of pathological gamblers compared to normative data and show that impulsivity is related to the severity of gambling behaviour as measured by the South Oaks Gambling Questionnaire. A principal component analysis of the Eysenck Impulsivity Scale and the Personality Disorder Questionnaire‐Revised, demonstrated that the concept of the "antisocial‐impulsivist" identified by Blaszczynski, Steel & McConaghy (1997) is not only characterized by impulsivity and antisocial personality disorder but also by high loadings from other cluster B and cluster C personality disorders. Conclusion. This research supports the role of the construct of impulsivity in mediating the severity of gambling behaviour and associated behavioural and psychological disturbance among pathological gamblers presenting for treatment. Impulsivity is best understood as part of a general personality disorder structure characterized primarily by DSM‐III‐R Axis II cluster B and some cluster C personality disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.93689511.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathological gamblers are generally more impulsive than non-pathological gamblers.

    “Further, studies reveal that PGs are generally more impulsive than non-PGs (Ledgerwood, Alessi, Phoenix, & Petry, 2009; Petry, 2001; Steel & Blaszczynski, 1998; Vitaro, Arseneault, & Tremblay, 1999).”

    From Subtyping Pathological Gamblers Based on Impulsivity, Depression, and Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Steel & Blaszczynski, 1998

    The Introduction concludes that pathological gamblers show elevated impulsivity compared with the general population, and the Discussion’s Table 2 reports higher impulsivity scores for the study’s clinical sample than for normative controls. The Discussion cautions that the relationship has only been demonstrated in clinical populations and that it remains unknown whether elevated impulsivity also occurs among non-problem gamblers. The claim’s general comparison with all non-pathological gamblers therefore goes beyond what the paper establishes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. OCK , C. C. & G RAC E, D. M. (1988 ) Pathological gamblers are neither impulsive nor sensation-seek- ers, Australian and New Zealan d Journal of Psychiatry, 22, 307± 301.
  2. AMERICAN PSYCH IATRIC ASSOCIATION (APA ) (1980 ) Diagnostic and Statistical M anual of M ental Disorders, 3rd edn (W ashington, Am erican Psychiatric Associ- ation Press).
  3. AMERICAN PSYCH IATRIC ASSOCIATION (APA ) (1987 ) Diagnostic and Statistical M anual of M ental Disorders, 3rd ednÐ revised (W ashington, American Psychi- atric Association Press).
  4. AMERICAN PSYCH IATRIC ASSOCIATION (APA ) (1994 ) Diagnostic and Statistical M anual of M ental Disorders, 4th edn (W ashington, American Psychiatric Associ- ation Press).
  5. BARRATT , E. S. (1985 ) Impulsiveness subtraits: arousal and inform ation processing, in: SPENCE, J. T. & BUTC HER, J. (Eds) A dvances in Personality Assessment, vol. 5 (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum ).
  6. BLASZCZYNSK I, A. P. & STEEL, Z. P. (1998 ) Personality disorders in pathological gambling, Journal of Gam- bling Studies, in press.
  7. CARLTON , P. L. & MANO WITZ , P. (1994 ) Factors deter- mining the severity of pathological gam blers in males, Journal of G am bling Studies, 10, 147± 157.
  8. H YLER , S., SKODOL , A., KELLM AN , H., OLDHAM , J. & RO SNICK , L. (1990 ) Validity of the Personality Diag- nostic QuestionnaireÐ Revised: a com parison of two structured interview s, Am erican Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1043± 1048.
  9. LAC EY , J. H . & EVANS , C. D. H . (1986 ) The impul- sivist: a m ulti-im pulsive personality disorder, British Journal of Addictions, 81, 641± 649.
  10. LESIEUR, H. & BLUME, S. (1986 ) The South Oaks G ambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrum ent for the identi® cation of pathological gam blers, A merican Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184± 1188 .
  11. M CC ORM ICK, R. A., TABER, J., KRUEDELBACH, N. & RUSSO, A. (1987 ) Personality pro® les of hospitalised pathological gam blers: the California Personality In- ventory, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 521± 527 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steel, Z., & Blaszczynski, A.
Affiliations
Liverpool Hospital (AU)
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-06
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
895-905
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1967953340
Cited by
304
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 22
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
impulsivity, gambling addiction, gambling severity, personality disorders, antisocial personality disorder, cluster B personality disorders, cluster C personality disorders, South Oaks Gambling Screen, depression, anxiety, problem gambling treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Gambling, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review