Cited by 258Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning Development

Early child–parent attachment and peer relations: A meta-analysis of recent research.

Pallini, Susanna, Baiocco, Roberto, Schneider, Barry H., Madigan, Sheri, Atkinson, Leslie·2014·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

A central tenet of Bowlby's attachment theory is that early child-caregiver attachment is reflected in the quality of the child's interpersonal relationships throughout life. Schneider, Atkinson, and Tardif (2001) conducted a meta-analysis of studies conducted up to 1998 to corroborate that contention. They found a significant but small to moderate effect size (r = .20). Their finding that studies of friendship bonds had higher effect sizes than studies of other interpersonal relationships has important theoretical ramifications. The present brief report is a meta-analysis that covers research conducted for the same purpose since 1998. The sample consists of 44 studies with a total of 8505 participants. The overall effect size r of .19 (adjusted r = .12; 95% confidence interval, .08-.17) in the current study was similar in magnitude to the effect size reported in the 2001 meta-analysis, documenting consistency in the predictive power of attachment theory. However, we failed to replicate the moderating effect of friendship. One possible explanation for these findings is that the friendships of school-age children and adolescents no longer invoke very high levels of intimacy. Effect sizes are higher in studies conducted outside North America than in U.S.--and Canada-based studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0035736

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pallini, S., Baiocco, R., Schneider, B. H., Madigan, S., & Atkinson, L.
Affiliations
  • Roma Tre University (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2014
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
118-123
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2024031344
Cited by
258
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
peer relationships, friendship, attachment theory, interpersonal relationships, intimacy, elementary school students, adolescents, cross-cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Peer Group

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review