Cited by 17Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning Development

Is middle childhood attachment related to social functioning in young adulthood?

Fransson, Mari, Granqvist, Pehr, Marciszko, Carin, Hagekull, Berit, Bohlin, Gunilla·2016·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The aim of the present study (N = 69) was to examine whether middle childhood attachment, measured using the Separation Anxiety Test (Slough, Goyette & Greenberg, 1988), predicts aspects of social functioning (social initiative, prosocial orientation, social anxiety, loneliness) in young adulthood. Insecurity‐avoidance at age 8.5 years was, as expected, negatively related to social initiative and prosocial orientation, and was also positively related to social anxiety and loneliness at age 21 years. In addition, insecurity‐avoidance contributed to developmental change in social anxiety from middle childhood to young adulthood. Contrary to our expectations, the two security scales were generally unrelated to future social functioning. Taken together, these results extend previous research by showing that insecurity‐avoidance is related to social functioning also beyond childhood and adolescence, and that it contributes to developmental change in social functioning over time. The scarcity of prospective links for the attachment security scales points to the need for future studies addressing when and why attachment does not contribute to future social functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sjop.12276

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fransson, M., Granqvist, P., Marciszko, C., Hagekull, B., & Bohlin, G.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Department of Psychology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
Corresponding author
Fransson, Mari
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-05
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
108-116
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2311350999
Cited by
17
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
attachment, middle childhood, social functioning, early adulthood, attachment security, social anxiety, loneliness, social initiatives, prosocial orientation, developmental changes
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review