Cited by 17Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Validating indicators of treatment response: application to trichotillomania

Open access
Nelson, Samuel O., Rogers, Kate, Rusch, Natalie, McDonough, Lauren, Malloy, Elizabeth J., Falkenstein, Martha J., Banis, Maria, Haaga, David A. F.·2014·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Different studies of the treatment of trichotillomania (TTM) have used varying standards to determine the proportion of patients who obtain clinically meaningful benefits, but there is little information on the similarity of results yielded by these methods or on their comparative validity. Data from a stepped-care (Step 1: Web-based self-help; Step 2: Individual behavior therapy; N = 60) treatment study of TTM were used to evaluate 7 potential standards: complete abstinence, ≥ 25% symptom reduction, recovery of normal functioning, and clinical significance (recovery + statistically reliable change), each of the last 3 being measured by self-report (Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale; MGH-HPS) or interview (Psychiatric Institute Trichotillomania Scale). Depending on the metric, response rates ranged from 25 to 68%. All standards were significantly associated with one another, though less strongly for the 25% symptom reduction metrics. Concurrent (with deciding to enter Step 2 treatment) and predictive (with 3-month follow-up treatment satisfaction, TTM-related impairment, quality of life, and diagnosis) validity results were variable but generally strongest for clinical significance as measured via self-report. Routine reporting of the proportion of patients who make clinically significant improvement on the MGH-HPS, supplemented by data on complete abstinence, would bolster the interpretability of TTM treatment outcome findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0036333

Cites

30 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 2002 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition With Psychotic Screen New York Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute
  2. WHOQOL Group 1998 Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment Psychological Medicine 28 551 558 9626712

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, S. O., Rogers, K., Rusch, N., McDonough, L., Malloy, E. J., Falkenstein, M. J., Banis, M., & Haaga, D. A. F.
Affiliations
American University (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2014-09
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
857-864
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2322554599
Cited by
17
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1R15MH086852-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
trichotillomania, treatment outcome assessment, clinical significance, symptom relief, stepped care, behavior therapy, treatment satisfaction, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Self-Help Groups, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Trichotillomania, Reproducibility of Results, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review