Cited by 74Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Group treatment for trichotillomania: behavior therapy versus supportive therapy

Diefenbach, Gretchen J., Tolin, David F., Hannan, Scott, Maltby, Nicholas, Crocetto, Johanna·2006·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

In this randomized controlled trial, group behavior therapy (BT; n=12) was compared to group supportive therapy (ST; n=12) in the treatment of trichotillomania (TTM). Both treatments were also compared to a naturally occurring waiting period, the time period that participants waited for groups to form. Participants completing group BT experienced significantly greater decreases in self-reported hair-pulling symptoms and clinician-rated hair loss severity than did those in group ST. Decreases were significantly greater after treatment than after the naturalistic waiting period. In addition, a significantly higher percentage of those in the BT than ST condition were rated as much improved or very much improved on the Clinical Global Impression scale at posttreatment. However, despite substantial symptom improvement, TTM severity remained problematic at posttreatment. Specifically, few participants in either treatment met criteria for clinically significant change at posttreatment. In addition, relapse of symptoms occurred over the 6-month follow-up period. Results provided partial support for the short-term efficacy of group BT. However, the group format may not maximize the efficacy of BT for TTM. Thus, it is recommended that future BT research test either individual therapy or a combination of group and individual formats for TTM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2006.01.006

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diefenbach, G. J., Tolin, D. F., Hannan, S., Maltby, N., & Crocetto, J.
Affiliations
Hartford Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Diefenbach, Gretchen J.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
353-363
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037839288
Cited by
73
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
trichotillomania, relapse, treatment efficacy, waiting period, Clinical Global Impression Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Trichotillomania, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review