Cited by 42Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

ACT-enhanced group behavior therapy for trichotillomania and skin-picking disorder: a feasibility study

Open access
Asplund, Mia, Rück, Christian, Lenhard, Fabian, Gunnarsson, Tove, Bellander, Martin, Delby, Hanna, Ivanov, Volen Z.·2021·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ACT-enhanced Group Behavior Therapy (AEGBT) for mixed diagnosis groups including patients with trichotillomania (TTM) and skin-picking disorder (SPD) in routine psychiatric care. METHOD: Adult patients (N = 40) with TTM and/or SPD received 10 weeks of AEGBT followed by five booster sessions. The primary outcome measure for TTM was the Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) and for SPD the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R), assessed at posttreatment and at booster sessions. RESULTS: Results showed significant reductions in hair pulling and skin-picking severity from baseline to posttreatment and large effect sizes at posttreatment. Improvements remained significant at the 12-month follow-up for patients with SPD, but not for patients with TTM. Group attendance was high and few patients dropped out from treatment. The group format enabled therapists to see 25% more patients compared with an individual format. CONCLUSION: The results provide initial support for the feasibility and efficacy of an adapted treatment approach for TTM and SPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.23147

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asplund, M., Rück, C., Lenhard, F., Gunnarsson, T., Bellander, M., Delby, H., & Ivanov, V. Z.
Affiliations
Region Stockholm (SE)
Corresponding author
Asplund, Mia
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-03
Volume
77
Issue
7
Pages
1537-1555
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W3158367024
Cited by
42
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fredrik och Ingrid Thurings Stiftelse (2017‐00351)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
trichotillomania, skin picking disorder, acceptance and commitment therapy, hair pulling, skin picking, booster sessions, treatment feasibility, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Group Processes, Humans, Psychotherapy, Group, Trichotillomania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review