Cited by 380Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Effect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Open access
Galante, Julieta, Galante, Ignacio, Bekkers, Marie-Jet, Gallacher, John·2014·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Kindness-based meditation (KBM) is a rubric covering meditation techniques developed to elicit kindness in a conscious way. Some techniques, for example, loving-kindness meditation and compassion meditation, have been included in programs aimed at improving health and well-being. Our aim was to systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence available from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of KBM on health and well-being against passive and active control groups in patients and the general population. METHOD: Searches were completed in March 2013. Two reviewers applied predetermined eligibility criteria (RCTs, peer-reviewed publications, theses or conference proceedings, adult participants, KBM interventions) and extracted the data. Meta-analyses used random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included. KBM was moderately effective in decreasing self-reported depression (standard mean difference [Hedges's g] = -0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.08, -0.14]) and increasing mindfulness (Hedges's g = 0.63, 95% CI [0.22, 1.05]), compassion (Hedges's g = 0.61, 95% CI [0.24, 0.99]) and self-compassion (Hedges's g = 0.45, 95% CI [0.15, 0.75]) against passive controls. Positive emotions were increased (Hedges's g = 0.42, 95% CI [0.10, 0.75]) against progressive relaxation. Exposure to KBM may initially be challenging for some people. RESULTS were inconclusive for some outcomes, in particular against active controls. The methodological quality of the reports was low to moderate. RESULTS suffered from imprecision due to wide CIs deriving from small studies. CONCLUSIONS: KBM showed evidence of benefits for the health of individuals and communities through its effects on well-being and social interaction. Further research including well-conducted large RCTs is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0037249

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental evidence suggests that connection practices increase well-being and decrease psychological symptoms.

    “Experimental evidence suggests that connection practices increase well-being and decrease psychological symptoms [8,60].”

    From Testing the efficacy of a multicomponent, self-guided, smartphone-based meditation app: Three-armed randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Main results section reports that kindness-based meditation can increase positive emotions and reduce depression compared with passive controls, supporting the claim's cautious wording. But the findings are inconsistent: quality of life and life satisfaction did not significantly improve, and evidence for reduced anxiety and stress was mixed. The source studies kindness-based meditation, not connection practices generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Meta-analyses involving hundreds of RCTs suggest that meditation training can decrease psychological symptoms and increase aspects of well-being and positive functioning.

    “Meta-analyses involving hundreds of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that meditation training can decrease psychological symptoms (eg, depression, anxiety, stress) and increase aspects of well-being and positive functioning (eg, meaning in life, compassion, prosocial behavior) [6-15].”

    From Testing the efficacy of a multicomponent, self-guided, smartphone-based meditation app: Three-armed randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Abstract reports that this meta-analysis included 22 studies and found that kindness-based meditation reduced self-reported depression and increased compassion and self-compassion compared with passive controls. The Effects of the intervention section also reports reduced stress, but mixed findings for helping behavior. This source supports several examples in the citing sentence, but it studies kindness-based meditation specifically; it does not itself establish the sentence’s broader claim about meditation training across hundreds of RCTs or its example of meaning in life. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Loving-kindness meditation is linked with many psychological benefits, especially reduced depression, improved well-being, and increased social interaction.

    “LKM is linked with many psychological benefits, especially reduced depression, improved well-being, and increased social interaction (Galante, Galante, Bekkers, & Gallacher, 2014).”

    From Stress and coping in the time of COVID-19: Pathways to resilience and recovery (2020) · cites this paper as Galante, Galante, Bekkers, & Gallacher, 2014

    The Abstract reports reduced self-reported depression, and Main results describes encouraging but inconsistent benefits for well-being and outcomes related to social interaction. The claim overstates the social finding: the Discussion says there was no direct evidence that the intervention enhanced social connections. The review also evaluates kindness-based meditation broadly, not LKM alone. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent meta-analysis of Buddhist meditation techniques considered a dimension representing 'kindness and social domains' alongside health, well-being and suffering, and concluded that the results for the clinical and social effects of the nine examined studies were encouraging, but inconsistent.

    “Recognising that meditation may influence social behaviour, a recent meta-analysis of Buddhist meditation techniques considered a dimension representing ‘kindness and social domains’, alongside health, well-being and suffering17. It was concluded that the results for the clinical and social effects of the nine examined studies were encouraging, but inconsistent.”

    From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [17]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LKM improves depression, mindfulness, compassion, self-compassion, and positive affect.

    “a recent meta-analysis found that LKM indeed improves depression, mindfulness, compassion, self-compassion, and positive affect (Galante, Galante, Bekkers, & Gallacher, 2014).”

    From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Galante, Galante, Bekkers, & Gallacher, 2014

    The Abstract and Conclusions report reduced depression and increased mindfulness, compassion, and self-compassion versus passive controls, plus increased positive emotions versus progressive relaxation. But these are findings for kindness-based meditation as a group of practices, not specifically for LKM; the citing sentence also omits the differing comparators. The Effects of the intervention section reports mixed or nonsignificant results against some active controls. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 98 · Cited by 380

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Carson, J. W. (2006). Loving-kindness meditation findings not related to baseline differences. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 24 (1), 5-6.
  2. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis . New York, NY: Academic Press.
  3. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions . Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  4. Humphrey, C. W. (1999). A stress management intervention with forgiveness as the goal. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering (4-B), 1855.
  5. Kelly, A. C. (2012). Training in self-compassion: Reducing distress and facilitating behaviour change. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 72 (7-B), 4322.
  6. Kleinman, B. M. (2010). Differential effects of meditation on relationship quality. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 72 (1-B), 539.
  7. Mascaro, J. S. (2011). A longitudinal investigation of empathic behavior and neural activity and their modulation by compassion meditation. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 72 (12-A), 4629.
  8. May, M. (2005). The effects of a self-acceptance training emphasizing compassion and mindfulness skills with inner experiences. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 66 (1-B), 565.
  9. Pryor, V. K. (2011). Mindfulness and lovingkindness meditation: A comparative analysis. (Doctoral thesis, California Institute of Integral Studies). Retrieved from http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/hkul/4812994
  10. Wong, G. (2011). Live to love as a way to love your living: Cultivating compassion by loving-kindness meditation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 72 (6-B), 3751.

Authors
Galante, J., Galante, I., Bekkers, M.-J., & Gallacher, J.
Affiliations
  • Cochrane Canada (CA)
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2014-12
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
1101-1114
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1996548000
Cited by
380
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
loving-kindness meditation, compassion meditation, depression, mindfulness, compassion, self-compassion, positive emotions, well-being, meditation intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Empathy, Health Status, Humans, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Meditation, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review