Cited by 44Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Feasibility of mindfulness-based intervention for incarcerated mixed-ethnic Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander youth

Open access
Le, Thao N., Proulx, Jeffrey·2015·Asian American Journal of Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/aap0000019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le, T. N., & Proulx, J.
Venue
Asian American Journal of Psychology
Published
2015-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
181-189
ISSN
  • 1948-1985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-1993
OpenAlex
W2316066587
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Asian American Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
United States Department of Agriculture (HAW03523-H)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, feasibility, incarcerated youth, Pacific Islander youth, juvenile detention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review