Cited by 95Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCultural Competency in Health CareRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

A Systematic Review of Ethnoracial Representation and Cultural Adaptation of Mindfulness- and Meditation-Based Interventions

DeLuca, Sarah M., Kelman, Alex R., Waelde, Lynn C.·2018·Psychological Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12646-018-0452-z

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implementation of mindfulness programs by teachers among their students is influenced by factors including teacher's understanding and beliefs, instructional strategies, school culture, administrative support, resources, student characteristics, fidelity, professional development, and curriculum alignment.

    “The implementation of mindfulness programs by teachers among their students is influenced by many factors.These include the teacher's own understanding and beliefs regarding mindfulness, and their instructional strategies for incorporating mindfulness within the classroom setting (Kenwright et al., 2023).”
  • A systematic review of literature from 1990 to 2016 found only 24 studies examining the effectiveness of mindfulness meditation in people of color samples, and just 25% of these studies were conducted with adults.

    “A more recent systematic review surveying literature from 1990 to 2016 found only 24 studies examining the effectiveness of mindfulness meditation in POC samples, and just 25% of these studies were conducted with adults [36].”
  • Evidence-based treatment (mindfulness meditation) continues to be understudied among POC in both traditional and digital formats.

    “Despite extensive evidence showing the negative mental health effects of race-related stress in POC [6-11,14-17] and the promise of mindfulness meditation to help these individuals cope [20-24,26,30-32,79], this evidence-based treatment continues to be understudied among this high-risk population in both traditional [30,35,36] and digital formats [46-48].”
  • Racial/ethnic minority populations are at increased risk for racism-related negative psychological and physical health consequences and have been historically underrepresented in research on mindfulness.

    “Racial/ethnic minority populations are at increased risk for racism-related negative psychological and physical health consequences [135] and have been historically underrepresented in research on mindfulness [136,137].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeLuca, S. M., Kelman, A. R., & Waelde, L. C.
Affiliations
Palo Alto University (US)
Corresponding author
Waelde, Lynn C.
Venue
Psychological Studies
Published
2018-05-22
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
117-129
ISSN
  • 0033-2968 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-9861
OpenAlex
W2803970229
Cited by
95
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, meditation-based interventions, racial and ethnic minorities, cultural adaptation, mindfulness-based stress reduction, health care disparities, underrepresentation in clinical research, women in research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review