Cited by 56LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyBullying, Victimization, and AggressionMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Mindfulness as a coping strategy for bias-based school victimization among Latina/o sexual minority youth.

Open access
Toomey, Russell B., Anhalt, Karla·2016·Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity

Abstract

This study examined whether mindfulness strategies (e.g., acting non-judgmentally with awareness and attention to present events) were effective in mitigating the associations among school-based victimization related to ethnicity and sexual orientation, well-being (i.e., depressive symptoms and self-esteem), and grade-point average (GPA). The U.S.-based sample included 236 Latina/o sexual minority students, ranging in age from 14 to 24 years (47% were enrolled in secondary schools, 53% in postsecondary schools). Results from structural equation modeling revealed that ethnicity-based school victimization was negatively associated with GPA but not well-being. However, sexual orientation-based victimization was not associated with well-being or GPA. Mindfulness was positively associated with well-being but not GPA. High levels of mindfulness coping were protective when the stressor was sexual orientation-based victimization but not ethnicity-based school victimization. These findings contribute to a growing literature documenting the unique school barriers experienced by Latina/o sexual minority youth and highlight the promising utility of mindfulness-based intervention strategies for coping with minority stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/sgd0000192

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-sectional research with sexual minority populations has identified mindfulness and self-compassion as protective factors against psychological distress.

    “Cross-sectional research with sexual minority populations has also identified mindfulness and self-compassion as relevant protective factors against psychological distress (Lyons, 2016; Toomey & Anhalt, 2016; Toplu-Demirtaş et al., 2018).”

    From Mindfulness for Reducing Minority Stress and Promoting Health Among Sexual Minority Men: Uncovering Intervention Principles and Techniques (2022) · cites this paper as Toomey & Anhalt, 2016

    The Results and Discussion report that mindfulness buffered the association between sexual-orientation-based school victimization and depressive symptoms among Latina/o sexual minority youth. The Discussion explicitly says self-compassion was not tested in this study, so this source does not establish it as a protective factor. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ghavami N Cunningham Michael An intersectional approach to examining urban middle school students’ intergroup attitudes about LGB peers of various ethnic groups Intersectionality and racial-ethnic adolescents 2016 Symposium conducted at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence Baltimore, MD, USA (Chair)
  2. Kuper LE Coleman BR Mustanski BS Coping with LGBT and racial-ethnic-related stressors: A mixed-methods study of LGBT youth of color Journal of Research on Adolescence 2014 24 4 703 719
  3. Little TD Longitudinal structural equation modeling 2013 New York Guilford Press
  4. Little T Henrich C Jones S Hawley P Disentangling the" whys" from the" whats" of aggressive behaviour International Journal of Behavioral Development 2003 27 2 122 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toomey, R. B., & Anhalt, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
Venue
Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
Published
2016-12
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
432-441
ISSN
  • 2329-0382 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-0390
OpenAlex
W2563687716
Cited by
56
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (L60 MD008862)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness, coping strategies, school victimization, sexual minority youth, Latina/o students, minority stress, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, grade point average, well-being, mindfulness-based interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review