Cited by 168Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Self-referential processing in depressed adolescents: A high-density event-related potential study

Open access
Auerbach, Randy P., Stanton, Colin H., Proudfit, Greg Hajcak, Pizzagalli, Diego A.·2015·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Despite the alarming increase in the prevalence of depression during adolescence, particularly among female adolescents, the pathophysiology of depression in adolescents remains largely unknown. Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide an ideal approach to investigate cognitive-affective processes associated with depression in adolescents, especially in the context of negative self-referential processing biases. In this study, healthy (n = 30) and depressed (n = 22) female adolescents completed a self-referential encoding task while ERP data were recorded. To examine cognitive-affective processes associated with self-referential processing, P1, P2, and late positive potential (LPP) responses to negative and positive words were investigated, and intracortical sources of scalp effects were probed using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Additionally, we tested whether key cognitive processes (e.g., maladaptive self-view, self-criticism) previously implicated in depression related to ERP components. Relative to healthy female subjects, depressed females endorsed more negative and fewer positive words, and free recalled and recognized fewer positive words. With respect to ERPs, compared with healthy female adolescents, depressed adolescents exhibited greater P1 amplitudes following negative words, which was associated with a more maladaptive self-view and self-criticism. In both early and late LPP responses, depressed females showed greater activity following negative versus positive words, whereas healthy females demonstrated the opposite pattern. For both P1 and LPP, LORETA revealed reduced inferior frontal gyrus activity in response to negative words in depressed versus healthy female adolescents. Collectively, these findings suggest that the P1 and LPP reflect biased self-referential processing in female adolescents with depression. Potential treatment implications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000023

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Naumann E Bartussek D Diedrich O Laufer ME 1992 Assessing cognitive and affective information processing functions of the brain by means of the late positive complex of the event-related potential Journal of Psychophysiology 6 4 285 298
  2. Rudolph KD Gotlib Ian H Hammen Constance L 2009 Adolescent Depression Handbook of Depression 444 466 New York Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auerbach, R. P., Stanton, C. H., Proudfit, G. H., & Pizzagalli, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2015-05
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
233-245
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2133058207
Cited by
168
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10
FWCI
15.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH097786, R01MH68376 and R01MH101521)
  • Harvard Medical School
  • Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation
  • Tommy Fuss Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
adolescent depression, self-referential processing, P1 component, late positive potential, P2 component, self-criticism, inferior frontal gyrus, LORETA source localization, emotional word processing, adolescent girls
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Self Concept, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review