Cited by 104Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Adolescent Depression: Stress and Reward Dysfunction

Open access
Auerbach, Randy P., Admon, Roee, Pizzagalli, Diego A.·2014·Harvard Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After participating in this educational activity, the physician should be better able to 1. Evaluate the relationship between reward processes, stress, and depression. 2. Assess the characteristics of the three etiological models of stress and reward processes. 3. Identify the biological basis for stress and reward processes. Adolescence is a peak period for the onset of depression, and it is also a time marked by substantial stress as well as neural development within the brain reward circuitry. In this review, we provide a selective overview of current animal and human research investigating the relationship among reward processes, stress, and depression. Three separate, but related, etiological models examine the differential roles that stress may play in relation to reward dysfunction and adolescent depression. First, the reward mediation model suggests that both acute and chronic stress contribute to reward deficits, which, in turn, potentiate depressive symptoms or increase the risk for depression. Second, in line with the stress generation perspective, it is plausible that premorbid reward-related dysfunction generates stress--in particular, interpersonal stress--which then leads to the manifestation of depressive symptoms. Third, consistent with a diathesis-stress model, the interaction between stress and premorbid reward dysfunction may contribute to the onset of depression. Given the equifinal nature of depression, these models could shed important light on different etiological pathways during adolescence, particularly as they may relate to understanding the heterogeneity of depression. To highlight the translational potential of these insights, a hypothetical case study is provided as a means of demonstrating the importance of targeting reward dysfunction in both assessment and treatment of adolescent depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hrp.0000000000000034

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [33]Auerbach R Ho M An integrated cognitive-interpersonal model of depression: The impact of family conflict and depressogenic cognitive styles J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2012 41 792 802 23057789
  2. [59]Masten CL Eisenberger NI Borofsky LA Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: understanding the distress of peer rejection Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2009 4 143 57 19470528 PMC2686232
  3. [61]Rudolph KD Developmental influences on interpersonal stress generation in depressed youth J Abnorm Psychol 2008 117 673 9 18729618 PMC2704094
  4. [81]Blum K Sheridan PJ Wood RC The D2 dopamine receptor gene as a determinant of reward deficiency syndrome J R Soc Med 1996 89 396 400 8774539 PMC1295855
  5. [82]Lawford BR Young R Noble EP Kann B Ritchie T The D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2) gene is associated with co-morbid depression, anxiety and social dysfunction in untreated veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder Eur Psychiatry 2006 21 180 5 16632165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auerbach, R. P., Admon, R., & Pizzagalli, D. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Auerbach, Randy P.
Venue
Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Published
2014-05
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
139-148
ISSN
1067-3229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323072403
Cited by
104
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Harvard Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH101521, R01MH095809, R01MH068376, K23MH097786, R01 MH68376)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adolescent depression, stress, diathesis-stress model, brain reward system, interpersonal stress, equifinality, depression heterogeneity, depression treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Animals, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Reward, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review