The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.
Open accessAbstract
The use of unreliable measures constitutes a threat to our understanding of psychopathology, because advancement of science using both behavioral and biologically oriented measures can only be certain if such measurements are reliable. Two pillars of the National Institute of Mental Health's portfolio-the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative for psychopathology and the target engagement initiative in clinical trials-cannot succeed without measures that possess the high reliability necessary for tests involving mediation and selection based on individual differences. We focus on the historical lack of reliability of attentional bias measures as an illustration of how reliability can pose a threat to our understanding. Our own data replicate previous findings of poor reliability for traditionally used scores, which suggests a serious problem with the ability to test theories regarding attentional bias. This lack of reliability may also suggest problems with the assumption (in both theory and the formula for the scores) that attentional bias is consistent and stable across time. In contrast, measures accounting for attention as a dynamic process in time show good reliability in our data. The field is sorely in need of research reporting findings and reliability for attentional bias scores using multiple methods, including those focusing on dynamic processes over time. We urge researchers to test and report reliability of all measures, considering findings of low reliability not just as a nuisance but as an opportunity to modify and improve upon the underlying theory. Full assessment of reliability of measures will maximize the possibility that RDoC (and psychological science more generally) will succeed. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although in a separate study, ketamine failed to illustrate a similar impact on attentional bias towards negative cues 128 , the use of a reaction time measure (the dot-probe task) with notoriously poor psychometric properties 136-138 may have impeded the ability to sensitively detect changes over time.”
From Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model (2020) · cites this paper as [138]
In the citing paper
“Our ability to identify individually relevant brain and behavioural changes depends on a high level of measurement accuracy, combined with appropriate statistical modelling, neither of which is widely used in RCTs.38”
From Precision clinical trials: a framework for getting to precision medicine for neurobehavioural disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Our ability to identify individually relevant brain and behavioural changes depends on a high level of measurement accuracy, combined with appropriate statistical modelling, neither of which is widely used in RCTs.38”
From Precision clinical trials: a framework for getting to precision medicine for neurobehavioural disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“One research challenge is the limited reliability of AB indices derived from manual response times, which may reflect measurement problems and the variability of anxiety-related ABs, as discussed earlier [19,56-58,98].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“One research challenge is the limited reliability of AB indices derived from manual response times, which may reflect measurement problems and the variability of anxiety-related ABs, as discussed earlier [19,56-58,98].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 · Cited by 37,615
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1 · Cited by 3,721
Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558 · Cited by 3,605
How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge
Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3078 · Cited by 3,566
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders : SCID-I : clinical version : scoresheet
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997) · American Psychiatric Press eBooks · Cited by 3,101
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J.-M., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Rebecca Treiman, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193014 · Cited by 2,758
Attentional bias in emotional disorders.
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. R. (1986) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15 · Cited by 2,553
Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204766 · Cited by 1,875
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061 · Cited by 1,733
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Harvey AG Watkins E Mansell W 2004 Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders New York Oxford University Press
- Nunnally JD Bernstein IH 1994 Psychometric theory 3 New York McGraw-Hill
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model
Price, R. B., & Duman, R. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0615-x · Cited by 739
Parsons, S. D., Kruijt, A., & Fox, E. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245919879695 · Cited by 450
Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?
McNally, R. J. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.005 · Cited by 272
Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.001 · Cited by 210
Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task
Chapman, A., Devue, C., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2019) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0947-6 · Cited by 172
Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable?
MacLeod, C., Grafton, B., & Notebaert, L. (2019) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505 · Cited by 173
Association between negative cognitive bias and depression: A symptom-level approach.
Beevers, C. G., Mullarkey, M. C., Dainer‐Best, J., Stewart, R. A., Labrada, J., Allen, J. J. B., McGeary, J. E., & Shumake, J. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000405 · Cited by 158
Computational Psychiatry Needs Time and Context
Hitchcock, P., Fried, E. I., & Frank, M. J. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-021621-124910 · Cited by 145
A developmental neuroscience perspective on affect-biased attention
Morales, S., Fu, X., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.08.001 · Cited by 146
Lazarov, A., Suarez‐Jimenez, B., Tamman, A. J. F., Falzon, L., Zhu, X., Edmondson, D. E., & Neria, Y. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718002313 · Cited by 122
The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity
Xu, Z., Adam, K. C. S., Fang, X., & Vogel, E. K. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0886-6 · Cited by 107
Skinner, I., Hübscher, M., Moseley, G. L., Lee, H., Wand, B. M., Traeger, A. C., Gustin, S. M., & McAuley, J. H. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0946-y · Cited by 108
Individual differences in computational psychiatry: A review of current challenges
Karvelis, P., Paulus, M. P., & Diaconescu, A. O. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105137 · Cited by 122
Kruijt, A., Parsons, S. D., & Fox, E. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000406 · Cited by 113
Hur, J., Stockbridge, M. D., Fox, A. S., & Shackman, A. J. (2019) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.012 · Cited by 95
Brown, V. M., Chen, J., Gillan, C. M., & Price, R. B. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.12.019 · Cited by 89
Marin, M., Hammoud, M. Z., Klumpp, H., Simon, N. M., & Milad, M. R. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4833 · Cited by 88
Price, R. B., Brown, V., & Siegle, G. J. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022 · Cited by 84
Fu, X., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2018) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2018.11.002 · Cited by 92
Hardman, C. A., Jones, A., Burton, S. P., Duckworth, J. J., McGale, L. S., Mead, B. R., Roberts, C. A., Field, M., & Werthmann, J. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104986 · Cited by 80
Hagan, K. E., Alasmar, A., Exum, A., Chinn, B., & Forbush, K. T. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104710 · Cited by 79
Attentional threat biases and their role in anxiety: A neurophysiological perspective
Wieser, M. J., & Keil, A. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.004 · Cited by 72
Waltmann, M., Schlagenhauf, F., & Deserno, L. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01739-7 · Cited by 69
Test-retest reliability of attention bias for food: Robust eye-tracking and reaction time indices
van Ens, W., Schmidt, U. H., Campbell, I. C., Roefs, A., & Werthmann, J. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.01.020 · Cited by 67
mHealth Assessment and Intervention of Depression and Anxiety in Older Adults
Grossman, J. T., Frumkin, M. R., Rodebaugh, T. L., & Lenze, E. J. (2020) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000255 · Cited by 68
Self-citationDainer‐Best, J., Lee, H. Y., Shumake, J., Yeager, D. S., & Beevers, C. G. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000602 · Cited by 62
Albery, I. P., Spada, M. M., & Nikčević, A. V. (2021) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2639 · Cited by 60
Klawohn, J., Bruchnak, A., Burani, K., Meyer, A., Lazarov, A., Bar‐Haim, Y., & Hajcak, G. (2020) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103762 · Cited by 69
McNamara, M. E., Zisser, M., Beevers, C. G., & Shumake, J. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104086 · Cited by 55
Jones, A., Christiansen, P., & Field, M. (2018) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000414 · Cited by 56
Optimizing assessments of post‐error slowing: A neurobehavioral investigation of a flanker task
Schroder, H. S., Nickels, S., Cárdenas, E. F., Breiger, M., Perlo, S., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2019) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13473 · Cited by 55
Smith, K. E., Mason, T. B., Juarascio, A., Weinbach, N., Dvorak, R., Crosby, R. D., & Wonderlich, S. A. (2020) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23235 · Cited by 53
Taylor, C. T., Stein, M. B., Simmons, A. N., He, F., Oveis, C., Shakya, H. B., Sieber, W. J., Fowler, J. H., & Jain, S. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.07.024 · Cited by 53
Attentional biases in human anxiety
Valadez, E. A., Pine, D. S., Fox, N. A., & Bar‐Haim, Y. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104917 · Cited by 65
The impact of negative affect on attention patterns to threat across the first 2 years of life.
Pérez‐Edgar, K. E., Morales, S., LoBue, V., Taber‐Thomas, B. C., Allen, E. K., Brown, K. M., & Buss, K. A. (2017) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000408 · Cited by 54
Heterogeneity of the Anxiety-Related Attention Bias: A Review and Working Model for Future Research
Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A., Roy, A. K., Denefrio, S., & Myruski, S. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702619838474 · Cited by 51
Vago, D. R., Gupta, R. S., & Lazar, S. W. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.015 · Cited by 54
Macatee, R. J., Albanese, B. J., Schmidt, N. B., & Cougle, J. R. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.013 · Cited by 47
Machulska, A., Eiler, T. J., Kleinke, K., Grünewald, A., Brück, R., Jahn, K., Niehaves, B., & Klucken, T. (2021) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103858 · Cited by 46
Attentional Bias in Children with Social Anxiety Disorder
Schmidtendorf, S., Wiedau, S., Asbrand, J., Tuschen‐Caffier, B., & Heinrichs, N. (2017) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-017-9880-7 · Cited by 45
Liu, P., Taber‐Thomas, B. C., Fu, X., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2017.11.016 · Cited by 45
Mapping Dynamic Interactions Among Cognitive Biases in Depression
Everaert, J., Bernstein, A., Joormann, J., & Koster, E. H. W. (2020) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073919892069 · Cited by 45
Self-citationLazarov, A., Basel, D., Dolan, S. C., Dillon, D. G., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Schneier, F. R. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.063 · Cited by 50
Diane Swick, A., & Ashley, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15226-7 · Cited by 47
Lenze, E. J., Nicol, G. E., Barbour, D. L., Kannampallil, T., Wong, A. W. K., Piccirillo, J., Drysdale, A. T., Sylvester, C. M., Haddad, R., Miller, J. P., et al. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.200042 · Cited by 43
Self-citationXu, I., Passell, E. J., Strong, R. W., Grinspoon, E. A., Wu, C. Y., Jung, L., Germine, L. T., & Germine, L. T. (2024) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026241253826 · Cited by 48
Adam, K. C. S., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13691 · Cited by 42
Naim, R., Kivity, Y., Bar‐Haim, Y., & Huppert, J. D. (2017) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.10.006 · Cited by 51
Self-citationBrown, V. M., Price, R. B., & Dombrovski, A. Y. (2023) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-023-01080-w · Cited by 51
Soleymani, A., Ivanov, Y., Mathôt, S., & de Jong, P. J. (2019) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106117 · Cited by 41
Intergenerational transmission of attentional bias and anxiety
Aktar, E., Bockstaele, B. V., Pérez‐Edgar, K. E., Wiers, R. W. H. J., & Bögels, S. M. (2018) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12772 · Cited by 40
Bockstaele, B. V., Lamens, L., Salemink, E., Wiers, R. W. H. J., Bögels, S. M., & Nikolaou, K. (2019) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2019.1609423 · Cited by 38
Everaert, J., & Koster, E. H. W. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816660-4.00009-x · Cited by 42
Vulnerabilities in social anxiety: Integrating intra- and interpersonal perspectives
Ginat-Frolich, R., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Huppert, J. D., Aderka, I. M., Alden, L. E., Bar-Haim, Y., Becker, E. S., Bernstein, A., Geva, R., Heimberg, R. G., et al. (2024) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102415 · Cited by 36
Self-citationApproach-avoidance modification as an add-on in smoking cessation: A randomized-controlled study
Wittekind, C. E., Reibert, E., Takano, K., Ehring, T. W., Pogarell, O. M., & Rüther, T. (2018) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.12.004 · Cited by 38
Kemps, E., Goossens, L., Petersen, J. M., Verbeken, S., Vervoort, L., & Braet, C. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101840 · Cited by 37
Grafton, B., Teng, S. S. W., & MacLeod, C. (2021) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103805 · Cited by 36
Reliability of Decision-Making and Reinforcement Learning Computational Parameters
Mkrtchian, A., Valton, V., & Roiser, J. P. (2023) · Computational Psychiatry · doi:10.5334/cpsy.86 · Cited by 49
Physically active individuals look for more: An eye‐tracking study of attentional bias
Cheval, B., Miller, M. W., Orsholits, D., Berry, T. R., Sander, D., & Boisgontier, M. P. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13582 · Cited by 41
Toward dynamic phenotypes and the scalable measurement of human behavior
Germine, L. T., Strong, R. W., Singh, S. M., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2020) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0757-1 · Cited by 30
Klawohn, J., Hajcak, G., Amir, N., Kathmann, N., & Riesel, A. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.07.005 · Cited by 38
Fu, X., Nelson, E. E., Borge, M., Buss, K. A., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2019) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579419000427 · Cited by 37
Shi, C., Taylor, S., Witthöft, M., Du, X., Zhang, T., Lu, S., & Ren, Z. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721005432 · Cited by 32
Attention bias modification reduces neural correlates of response monitoring
Nelson, B. D., Jackson, F. L., Amir, N., & Hajcak, G. (2017) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.059 · Cited by 32
Parsons, S. D., Kruijt, A., & Fox, E. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6ka9z · Cited by 35
Liu, P., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2018) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-018-0092-5 · Cited by 36
Psychometrics and Psychological Assessment
Hunsley, J. D., & Allan, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235433.002 · Cited by 33
Platt, B., Sfärlea, A., Buhl, C., Löchner, J., Neumüller, J., Thomsen, L. A., Starman‐Wöhrle, K., Salemink, E., & Schulte‐Körne, G. (2021) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-020-01105-2 · Cited by 33
Hitchcock, P. F., Britton, W. B., Mehta, K. P., & Frank, M. J. (2022) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-022-01033-9 · Cited by 30
Attention allocation in posttraumatic stress disorder: an eye-tracking study
Lazarov, A., Suarez‐Jimenez, B., Zhu, X., Pine, D. S., Bar‐Haim, Y., & Neria, Y. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721000581 · Cited by 31
Shamai‐Leshem, D., Linetzky, M., & Bar‐Haim, Y. (2022) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-022-10331-y · Cited by 34
A review of attentional bias modification trainings for depression
Guo, L., Cai, X., Yang, Q., Cui, Q., Huang, L., Jing, X., & Wang, Y. (2022) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.14022 · Cited by 29
Caudek, C., Ceccarini, F., & Sica, C. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.003 · Cited by 29
Attentional avoidance of emotional information in emotional eating
Deroost, N., & Cserjési, R. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.053 · Cited by 29
Thunberg, C., Wiker, T., Bundt, C., & Huster, R. J. (2024) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2024.02.008 · Cited by 31
Huppert, J. D., Kivity, Y., Cohen, L., Strauss, A. Y., Elizur, Y., & Weiss, M. (2018) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.002 · Cited by 30
Self-citationThe Reliability and Validity of Response-Based Measures of Attention Bias
Meissel, E. E. E., Liu, H., Stevens, E. S., Evans, T. C., Britton, J. C., Letkiewicz, A. M., & Shankman, S. A. (2021) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-021-10212-w · Cited by 26
Attentional bias toward negative stimuli in PTSD: an eye-tracking study
Veerapa, É., Grandgenèvre, P., Vaïva, G., Duhem, S., Fayoumi, M. E., Vinnac, B., Szaffarczyk, S., Wathelet, M., Fovet, T., & D’Hondt, F. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291722003063 · Cited by 26
The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation
Bockstaele, B. V., Notebaert, L., MacLeod, C., Salemink, E., Clarke, P., Verschuère, B., Bögels, S. M., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2018) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.08.010 · Cited by 26
Different attention bias patterns in anorexia nervosa restricting and binge/purge types
Mann, T. G., Hamdan, S., Bar‐Haim, Y., Lazarov, A., Enoch‐Levy, A., Dubnov‐Raz, G., Treasure, J. L., & Stein, D. J. (2018) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2593 · Cited by 25
Niles, A. N., Woolley, J. D., Tripp, P., Pesquita, A., Vinogradov, S., Neylan, T. C., & O’Donovan, A. (2020) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702620902119 · Cited by 26
Hsu, K. J., McNamara, M. E., Shumake, J., Stewart, R. A., Labrada, J., Alario, A. A., Gonzalez, G. D. S., Schnyer, D. M., & Beevers, C. G. (2020) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.23042 · Cited by 23
Rumination Derails Reinforcement Learning With Possible Implications for Ineffective Behavior
Hitchcock, P., Forman, E. M., Rothstein, N. J., Zhang, F., Kounios, J., Niv, Y., & Sims, C. R. (2021) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026211051324 · Cited by 25
Armstrong, T., Engel, M., Press, T., Sonstroem, A., & Reed, J. (2019) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-019-09770-0 · Cited by 24
Attentional biases in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder
Cabrera, I., Miranda, D. B., & Montorio, I. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102207 · Cited by 22
Simulating thoughts to measure and study internal attention in mental health
Amir, I., Ruimi, L., & Bernstein, A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81756-w · Cited by 22
Self-citationThe free-viewing matrix task: A reliable measure of attention allocation in psychopathology
Shamai‐Leshem, D., Abend, R., Arad, G., Azriel, O., Chong, L. J., de Jong, P. J., Dykan, C. D. G., Hajcak, G., Klawohn, J., Meyer, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102789 · Cited by 25
Attentional biases in depression: Relation to disorder severity, rumination, and anhedonia
Krings, A., Heeren, A., Fontaine, P., & Blairy, S. (2020) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152173 · Cited by 23
Schäfer, J., Zvielli, A., Höfler, M., Wittchen, H.-U., & Bernstein, A. (2018) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.01.004 · Cited by 22
Self-citationAttention allocation in OCD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking-based research
Basel, D., Hallel, H., Dar, R., & Lazarov, A. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.141 · Cited by 22
Cludius, B., Wenzlaff, F., Briken, P., & Wittekind, C. E. (2017) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.12.007 · Cited by 22
Beevers, C. G., Hsu, K. J., Schnyer, D. M., Smits, J. A. J., & Shumake, J. (2021) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000683 · Cited by 20
Woody, M. L., Miskovic, V., Owens, M., James, K. M., Feurer, C., Sosoo, E. E., & Gibb, B. E. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.12.007 · Cited by 20
Karoly, H. C., Schacht, J. P., Jacobus, J., Meredith, L. R., Taylor, C. T., Tapert, S. F., Gray, K. M., & Squeglia, L. M. (2019) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.007 · Cited by 20
Is the Hebb repetition task a reliable measure of individual differences in sequence learning?
Bogaerts, L., Siegelman, N., Ben-Porat, T., & Frost, R. (2017) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1307432 · Cited by 19
Cox, J. A., Christensen, B. K., & Goodhew, S. C. (2017) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2017.1386619 · Cited by 19
Auday, E. S., Taber‐Thomas, B. C., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.003 · Cited by 19
Attentional Bias Modification in Virtual Reality – A VR-Based Dot-Probe Task With 2D and 3D Stimuli
Ma, L., Kruijt, A., Nöjd, S., Zetterlund, E., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02526 · Cited by 18
Meta-Awareness of Dysregulated Emotional Attention
Ruimi, L., Hadash, Y., Zvielli, A., Amir, I., Goldstein, P., & Bernstein, A. (2018) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702618776948 · Cited by 17
Self-citationPrice, R. B., Beltz, A. M., Woody, M. L., Cummings, L. R., Gilchrist, D., & Siegle, G. J. (2020) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702620906149 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodebaugh, T. L., Scullin, R. B., Langer, J. K., Dixon, D. J., Huppert, J. D., Bernstein, A., Zvielli, A., & Lenze, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- University of Haifa (IL)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 840-851
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- PMC
- PMC4980228
- OpenAlex
- W2465300579
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 38.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2016-09-01)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH090308, R01MH070547)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024992)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- attentional bias, measurement reliability, psychopathology, Research Domain Criteria, target engagement, replication, individual differences, reliability reporting
- MeSH terms
- Attentional Bias, Mental Disorders, Humans, Individuality, Models, Psychological, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.), Research Design, United States, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review