The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.
Open accessAbstract
The use of unreliable measures constitutes a threat to our understanding of psychopathology, because advancement of science using both behavioral and biologically oriented measures can only be certain if such measurements are reliable. Two pillars of the National Institute of Mental Health's portfolio-the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative for psychopathology and the target engagement initiative in clinical trials-cannot succeed without measures that possess the high reliability necessary for tests involving mediation and selection based on individual differences. We focus on the historical lack of reliability of attentional bias measures as an illustration of how reliability can pose a threat to our understanding. Our own data replicate previous findings of poor reliability for traditionally used scores, which suggests a serious problem with the ability to test theories regarding attentional bias. This lack of reliability may also suggest problems with the assumption (in both theory and the formula for the scores) that attentional bias is consistent and stable across time. In contrast, measures accounting for attention as a dynamic process in time show good reliability in our data. The field is sorely in need of research reporting findings and reliability for attentional bias scores using multiple methods, including those focusing on dynamic processes over time. We urge researchers to test and report reliability of all measures, considering findings of low reliability not just as a nuisance but as an opportunity to modify and improve upon the underlying theory. Full assessment of reliability of measures will maximize the possibility that RDoC (and psychological science more generally) will succeed. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although in a separate study, ketamine failed to illustrate a similar impact on attentional bias towards negative cues 128 , the use of a reaction time measure (the dot-probe task) with notoriously poor psychometric properties 136-138 may have impeded the ability to sensitively detect changes over time.”
From Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model (2020) · cites this paper as [138]
In the citing paper
“Our ability to identify individually relevant brain and behavioural changes depends on a high level of measurement accuracy, combined with appropriate statistical modelling, neither of which is widely used in RCTs.38”
From Precision clinical trials: a framework for getting to precision medicine for neurobehavioural disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Our ability to identify individually relevant brain and behavioural changes depends on a high level of measurement accuracy, combined with appropriate statistical modelling, neither of which is widely used in RCTs.38”
From Precision clinical trials: a framework for getting to precision medicine for neurobehavioural disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“One research challenge is the limited reliability of AB indices derived from manual response times, which may reflect measurement problems and the variability of anxiety-related ABs, as discussed earlier [19,56-58,98].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“One research challenge is the limited reliability of AB indices derived from manual response times, which may reflect measurement problems and the variability of anxiety-related ABs, as discussed earlier [19,56-58,98].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 · Cited by 37,615
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1 · Cited by 3,721
Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558 · Cited by 3,605
How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge
Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3078 · Cited by 3,566
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders : SCID-I : clinical version : scoresheet
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997) · American Psychiatric Press eBooks · Cited by 3,101
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J.-M., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Rebecca Treiman, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193014 · Cited by 2,758
Attentional bias in emotional disorders.
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. R. (1986) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15 · Cited by 2,553
Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204766 · Cited by 1,875
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061 · Cited by 1,733
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Harvey AG Watkins E Mansell W 2004 Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders New York Oxford University Press
- Nunnally JD Bernstein IH 1994 Psychometric theory 3 New York McGraw-Hill
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 312
Henricks, L. A., Lange, W., Luijten, M., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Stoltz, S. E. M. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Becker, E. S. (2022) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-022-10304-1 · Cited by 18
House, T., Graham, K., Ellis, B., Bould, H., Attwood, A. S., Stephen, I. D., Brooks, K. R., & Penton‐Voak, I. S. (2022) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.12.003 · Cited by 23
Basanovic, J., Dean, L., Riskind, J. H., & MacLeod, C. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.10.004 · Cited by 16
Dynamic measures of anxiety-related threat bias: Links to stress reactivity
Egan, L. J., & Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A. (2018) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9674-6 · Cited by 16
Cognitive bias modification to prevent depression (COPE): results of a randomised controlled trial
Basanovic, J., Grafton, B., Ford, A. H., Hirani, V., Glance, D., MacLeod, C., & Almeida, O. P. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719002599 · Cited by 16
Watson, P., & Pelley, M. E. L. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102082 · Cited by 16
Attentional bias modification in social anxiety: Effects on the N2pc component
Reutter, M., Hewig, J. S., Wieser, M. J., & Osinsky, R. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.05.001 · Cited by 17
Alon, Y., Azriel, O., Pine, D. S., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329172200023x · Cited by 16
Vervoort, L., Braun, M., Schryver, M. D., Naets, T., Koster, E. H. W., & Braet, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644512 · Cited by 15
Soleymani, A., Mazidi, M., Neimeijer, R. A. M., & de Jong, P. J. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.105934 · Cited by 14
Investigating lay perceptions of psychological measures: A registered report
Mason, J., Pownall, M., Palmer, A., & Azevedo, F. (2023) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.9383 · Cited by 23
Computational modelling of attentional bias towards threat in paediatric anxiety
Thompson, A., & Steinbeis, N. (2020) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13055 · Cited by 15
Carlson, J. M., Fang, L., & Kassel, D. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100411 · Cited by 14
Categorical perception of facial expressions in individuals with non-clinical social anxiety
Qiu, F., Han, M., Zhai, Y., & Jia, S. (2017) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.09.001 · Cited by 15
Dainer‐Best, J., Disner, S. G., McGeary, J. E., Hamilton, B., & Beevers, C. G. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198950 · Cited by 14
Does alcohol cue inhibitory control training survive a context shift?
Jones, A., Baines, L. A., Ruddock, H. K., Franken, I. H. A., Verbruggen, F., & Field, M. (2020) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000580 · Cited by 15
Dondzilo, L., & Basanovic, J. (2023) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.08.001 · Cited by 13
Craving and tobacco use: Development of the choice behavior under cued conditions (CBUCC) procedure.
Gass, J. C., & Tiffany, S. T. (2017) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000259 · Cited by 13
Dodd, H. F., Rayson, H., Ryan, Z. J., Bishop, C., Parsons, S. D., & Stuijfzand, B. G. (2020) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000623 · Cited by 19
Heitmann, J., Jonker, N. C., & de Jong, P. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630461 · Cited by 13
Research Domain Criteria: Cutting Edge Neuroscience or Galen’s Humors Revisited?
Ross, C. A., & Margolis, R. L. (2018) · Complex Psychiatry · doi:10.1159/000493685 · Cited by 13
Psychometric properties of threat‐related attentional bias in young children using eye‐tracking
Chong, L. J., & Meyer, A. M. (2020) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.22053 · Cited by 13
Machulska, A., Kleinke, K., & Klucken, T. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01804-9 · Cited by 13
Putter, L. M. S. D., & Koster, E. (2017) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.09.001 · Cited by 12
Interparental hostility and children’s externalizing symptoms: Attention to anger as a mediator.
Davies, P. T., Coe, J. L., Hentges, R. F., Sturge‐Apple, M. L., & Ripple, M. T. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000520 · Cited by 12
Duque, A., & Vázquez, C. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22652 · Cited by 13
Price, R. B., Woody, M. L., Panny, B., & Siegle, G. J. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702619842556 · Cited by 12
Reliability of Decision-Making and Reinforcement Learning Computational ParametersPreprint
Mkrtchian, A., Valton, V., & Roiser, J. P. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.30.450026 · Cited by 12
Hoffman, S. N., Thomas, M. L., Pearlstein, S. L., Kakaria, S., Oveis, C., Stein, M. B., & Taylor, C. T. (2021) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.003 · Cited by 11
Bieleninik, Ł., Gradys, G., Dzhambov, A. M., Walczak‐Kozłowska, T., Lipowska, K., Łada‐Maśko, A., Sitnik‐Warchulska, K., Anikiej‐Wiczenbach, P., Harciarek, M., & Lipowska, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1246490 · Cited by 13
Ma, L., Kruijt, A., Ek, A.-K., Åbyhammar, G., Furmark, T., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2020) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2020.100334 · Cited by 10
Charvet, L. E., George, A., Cho, H., Krupp, L., & Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.719090 · Cited by 11
Abado, E., Aue, T., & Okon‐Singer, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232985 · Cited by 12
Temporal trends in attention disengagement from social threat as a function of social anxiety
McGlade, A. L., Craske, M. G., & Niles, A. N. (2019) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101529 · Cited by 14
Beyond vernacular: Measurement solutions to the lexical fallacy in disgust research
Armstrong, T., Dillion, D., Leong, D., & Hsu, K. J. (2021) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102408 · Cited by 14
Myruski, S., Cho, H., Bikson, M., & Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2021.652162 · Cited by 11
Zhao, Z., Yu, X., Ren, Z., Zhang, L., & Li, X. (2021) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2021.101711 · Cited by 12
Woronko, S. E., Jessup, S. C., Armstrong, T., Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Dalmaijer, E. S., & Olatunji, B. O. (2023) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102700 · Cited by 10
Emotion and anxiety interact to bias spatial attention.
Bachmann, H. P., JAPEE, S. A., Merriam, E. P., & Liu, T. T. (2023) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0001322 · Cited by 10
Werle, D., Sablottny, L., Tuschen‐Caffier, B., & Svaldi, J. (2024) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107284 · Cited by 12
Exploring Attentional Bias toward Alcohol Content: Insights from Eye-Movement Activity
Ghiţă, A., Hernández-Serrano, O., Moreno, M., Monràs, M., Gual, A., Maurage, P., Gacto‐Sánchez, M., Ferrer‐García, M., Porras-García, B., & Gutiérrez‐Maldonado, J. (2024) · European Addiction Research · doi:10.1159/000536252 · Cited by 10
Kadlec, J., Walsh, C. R., Sadé, U., Amir, A., Rissman, J., & Ramot, M. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00114-4 · Cited by 10
Lavi, S., Shamai‐Leshem, D., Bar‐Haim, Y., & Lazarov, A. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.058 · Cited by 11
Carlson, J. M., Fang, L., Coughtry-Carpenter, C., & Foley, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021858 · Cited by 10
Attentional Bias Among High and Low Ruminators: Eye Tracking Study in a Non-Clinical Population
Arënliu, A., Konjufca, J., Meiran, N., Weine, S. M., & Langenecker, S. A. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231170804 · Cited by 10
Lenze, E. J., Torous, J. B., & Areán, P. A. (2023) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-023-01664-7 · Cited by 11
Self-citationGladwin, T. E., & Vink, M. (2020) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2020.102930 · Cited by 10
Reliability of gamified reinforcement learning in densely sampled longitudinal assessments
Neuser, M. P., Kühnel, A., Kräutlein, F., Teckentrup, V., Svaldi, J., & Kroemer, N. B. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000330 · Cited by 11
Albery, I. P., Shove, E., Bartlett, G., Frings, D., & Spada, M. M. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106261 · Cited by 13
Hertz‐Palmor, N., Rozenblit, D., Lavi, S., Zeltser, J., Kviatek, Y., & Lazarov, A. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291723002519 · Cited by 9
Price, R. B., Panny, B., Degutis, M., & Griffo, A. (2020) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000651 · Cited by 10
The effect of attention on body size adaptation and body dissatisfaction
House, T., Stephen, I. D., Penton‐Voak, I. S., & Brooks, K. R. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211718 · Cited by 8
Yang, M.-J., Borges, A. M., Emery, N. N., & Leyro, T. M. (2022) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107456 · Cited by 9
Attention capture is temporally stable: Evidence from mixed-model correlations
Weichselbaum, H., Huber‐Huber, C., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.013 · Cited by 10
Hsu, K. J., Longoria, K. D., Pisner, D., Shumake, J., Risom, S., Ray, K. L., Smits, J. A. J., Schnyer, D. M., & Beevers, C. G. (2018) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2018.10.014 · Cited by 9
Anxiety-linked attentional bias: backward glances and future glimpses
MacLeod, C. (2018) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2018.1551190 · Cited by 9
Visualising two approaches to explore reliability-power relationshipsPreprint
Parsons, S. D. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qh5mf · Cited by 9
Investigating Lay Perceptions of Psychological Measures: A Registered ReportPreprint
Mason, J., Pownall, M., Palmer, A., & Azevedo, F. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jf58q · Cited by 9
Low working memory load facilitates attention bias modification training
Yap, D. L., Denefrio, S., & Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A. (2021) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103828 · Cited by 8
Spinelli, G., & Lupker, S. (2024) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-024-02892-9 · Cited by 7
Adamis, A. M., Walske, S. M., & Olatunji, B. O. (2025) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2025.104759 · Cited by 8
Positive Affect Treatment for Depression, Anxiety, and Low Positive Affect
Meuret, A. E., Rosenfield, D., Wang, E., Hough, C. M., Ritz, T., & Craske, M. G. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.7403 · Cited by 9
Peckham, A., Sandler, J. P., Dattolico, D., McHugh, R. K., Johnson, D. S., Björgvinsson, Þ., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Beard, C. (2021) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103968 · Cited by 8
Avoidance of mild threat observed in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) using eye tracking
Nelson, A. L., Quigley, L., Carriere, J. S. A., Kalles, E., Smilek, D., & Purdon, C. L. (2022) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102577 · Cited by 8
Webcam-Based Eye-Tracking of Attentional Biases in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Proof-Of-Concept Study
Greenaway, A.-M., Hwang, F., Nasuto, S. J., & Ho, A. K. (2023) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2023.2240783 · Cited by 10
Decoding and modifying dynamic attentional bias in gaming disorder
Oka, T., Kubo, T., Kobayashi, N., Murakami, M., Chiba, T., & Cortese, A. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0090 · Cited by 7
McGreen, J., Kemps, E., & Tiggemann, M. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105771 · Cited by 8
Gibb, B. E., Owens, M., & Brick, L. A. D. (2022) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13740 · Cited by 8
Shifting Episodic Prediction With Online Cognitive Bias Modification: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Eberle, J. W., Boukhechba, M., Sun, J., Zhang, D., Funk, D. H., Barnes, L. E., & Teachman, B. A. (2023) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026221103128 · Cited by 8
Exploring the ‘mood congruency’ hypothesis of attention allocation – An eye-tracking study
Hertz‐Palmor, N., Yosef, Y., Hallel, H., Bernat, I., & Lazarov, A. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.004 · Cited by 10
Simon, J., Grogna, D., Rivard, M., Heck, M., Bouchard, S., & Quertemont, É. (2022) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2022.849840 · Cited by 10
Clegg, I., Notebaert, L., & Richardson, C. E. (2024) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104569 · Cited by 7
Klonteig, S., Roalsø, E. S., Kraft, B., Moberget, T., Hilland, E., Mirtaheri, P., & Jonassen, R. (2025) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102036 · Cited by 7
Gade, P. R., Molloy, A. G., & Anderson, P. L. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23259 · Cited by 7
Packard, G. A., Molloy, A. G., & Anderson, P. L. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02817-5 · Cited by 7
Neophytou, K., & Panayiotou, G. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264256 · Cited by 7
Cludius, B., Landmann, S., Külz, A.-K., Takano, K., Moritz, S., & Jelinek, L. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270184 · Cited by 9
MacLean, R. R., Heapy, A. A., Waters, A. J., Wolkowicz, N. R., Szollosy, S. K., Meyerovich, J., & Sofuoglu, M. (2023) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109857 · Cited by 7
Concurrent electrophysiological recording and cognitive testing in a rodent touchscreen environment
Kangas, B. D., Iturra-Mena, A. M., Robble, M. A., Luc, O. T., Potter, D., Nickels, S., Bergman, J., Carlezon, W. A., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91091-9 · Cited by 8
Wise, S., Huang‐Pollock, C. L., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01532-3 · Cited by 7
Meregalli, V., Ambrosini, E., Tenconi, E., Schroeder, P. A., Cardi, V., Veronese, A., Meneguzzo, P., Favaro, A., & Collantoni, E. (2023) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2023.106639 · Cited by 6
House, T., Wong, H. K., Samuel, N. W.-Y., Stephen, I. D., Brooks, K. R., Bould, H., Attwood, A. S., & Penton‐Voak, I. S. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.230674 · Cited by 7
Implicit Measures in Clinical Sex Research: A Critical Evaluation
Hinzmann, J., Borg, C., & de Jong, P. J. (2020) · Sexual Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.06.005 · Cited by 7
Beyond Face Value: Assessing the Factor Structure of an Eye-Tracking Based Attention Bias Task
McNamara, M. E., Hsu, K. J., McSpadden, B., Risom, S., Shumake, J., & Beevers, C. G. (2023) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-023-10395-4 · Cited by 6
Hitchcock, P., Niv, Y., Radulescu, A., & Sims, C. R. (2017) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 6
Training Meta-Awareness to Modify Attentional Dyscontrol
Ruimi, L., Hendren, R. A., Amir, I., Zvielli, A., & Bernstein, A. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-019-01291-8 · Cited by 6
Self-citationReinforcement-Learning-Informed Queries Guide Behavioral Change
Brown, V. M., Lee, J., Wang, J., Casas, B. R., & Chiu, P. H. (2024) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026231213368 · Cited by 5
Byrne, M. E., Kirschner, S., Harrewijn, A., Abend, R., Lazarov, A., Liuzzi, L., Kircanski, K., Haller, S. P., Bar‐Haim, Y., & Pine, D. S. (2024) · Journal of Mood and Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100075 · Cited by 5
Judah, M. R., Hager, N., Hamrick, H. C., White, E. J., Mills, A. C., Taylor, D. L., Frosio, K. E., Kraft, J. D., & Grant, D. M. (2024) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108901 · Cited by 5
Hoepfel, D., Bila, A., Günther, V., Kersting, A., & Suslow, T. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99562-z · Cited by 6
Korkmaz, D., Knauth, K., Brands, A. M. A., Schmeck, M., Büning, P. E., & Peters, J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-13216-8 · Cited by 5
Coelho, S. G., Sears, C. R., Kim, H. S. A., & McGrath, D. S. (2022) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107575 · Cited by 8
Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A., Cho, H., & Myruski, S. (2022) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.12.010 · Cited by 6
Gall, R., Mcdonald, N., Huang, X., Wears, A., Price, R. B., Ostadabbas, S., Akçakaya, M., & Woody, M. L. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1360218 · Cited by 5
It is not always positive: emotional bias in young and older adults
Viviani, G., Luca, F. D., Antonucci, G., Yankouskaya, A., & Pecchinenda, A. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01614-2 · Cited by 5
von Koch, L., Kathmann, N., & Reuter, B. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104231 · Cited by 7
A look at the free-viewing paradigm in eye-tracking research to assess positive attentional bias
Suslow, T., Hoepfel, D., Wenk, T., Kersting, A., & Günther, V. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1659072 · Cited by 4
Wise, S., Huang‐Pollock, C. L., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2023) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108550 · Cited by 4
Kennedy, B. L., Camara, A. M., & Tran, D. M. D. (2023) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2023.107095 · Cited by 4
Reconciling attentional bias in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Adamis, A. M., & Olatunji, B. O. (2024) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100896 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodebaugh, T. L., Scullin, R. B., Langer, J. K., Dixon, D. J., Huppert, J. D., Bernstein, A., Zvielli, A., & Lenze, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- University of Haifa (IL)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 840-851
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- PMC
- PMC4980228
- OpenAlex
- W2465300579
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 38.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2016-09-01)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH090308, R01MH070547)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024992)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- attentional bias, measurement reliability, psychopathology, Research Domain Criteria, target engagement, replication, individual differences, reliability reporting
- MeSH terms
- Attentional Bias, Mental Disorders, Humans, Individuality, Models, Psychological, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.), Research Design, United States, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review