Cited by 11Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSchizophrenia research and treatmentAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Psychometric evaluation of a controlled social affiliation paradigm: Findings from anxiety, depressive disorder, and healthy samples

Open access
Hoffman, Samantha N., Thomas, Michael L., Pearlstein, Sarah L., Kakaria, Sanskruti, Oveis, Christopher, Stein, Murray B., Taylor, Charles T.·2021·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Social impairments are common across many psychiatric conditions. Standardized dyadic assessments intended to elicit social affiliation between unacquainted partners are used to elucidate mechanisms that disrupt relationship formation and inform possible treatment targets; however, the psychometric properties of such paradigms remain poorly understood. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a controlled social affiliation paradigm intended to induce connectedness between a target participant and trained confederate. Individuals with an anxiety or depressive disorder diagnosis (clinical group; n = 132) and those without (control group; n = 35) interacted face-to-face with a trained confederate; partners took turns answering a series of increasingly intimate questions about themselves. Social connectedness, affect, and affiliative behavior measures were collected during the interaction. Participant symptom and social functioning measures were collected to examine validity. The paradigm elicited escalating social connectedness throughout the task for both participants and confederates. Parallel forms (i.e., different question sets) elicited similar affiliation outcomes. Self-reported (but not behavioral) affiliation differed across some demographic variables (e.g., participant gender, Hispanic ethnicity). Within-task affiliation measures were associated with one another and with global social connectedness and social anxiety symptom measures, but not with somatic anxiety measures. Clinical participants reported lower social affiliation and positive affect reactivity and higher negative affect reactivity than healthy participants. These findings provide initial psychometric support for a standardized and controlled dyadic affiliation paradigm that could be used to reliably probe social disconnection mechanisms across psychopathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.003

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, S. N., Thomas, M. L., Pearlstein, S. L., Kakaria, S., Oveis, C., Stein, M. B., & Taylor, C. T.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Charles T.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
1464-1476
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159840176
Cited by
11
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (21695)
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH090243, R61MH113769, UL1TR001442)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
social affiliation, social connectedness, social anxiety, depressive disorders, psychometric properties, positive affect, negative affect, confederate interaction, social disconnection, relationship formation
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review