Do we overemphasize the role of culture in the behavior of racial/ethnic minorities? Evidence of a cultural (mis)attribution bias in American psychology.
Abstract
Although culture influences all human beings, there is an assumption in American psychology that culture matters more for members of certain groups. This article identifies and provides evidence of the cultural (mis)attribution bias: a tendency to overemphasize the role of culture in the behavior of racial/ethnic minorities, and to underemphasize it in the behavior of Whites. Two studies investigated the presence of this bias with an examination of a decade of peer reviewed research conducted in the United States (N = 434 articles), and an experiment and a survey with psychology professors in the United States (N = 361 psychologists). Archival analyses revealed differences in the composition of samples used in studies examining cultural or noncultural psychological phenomena. We also find evidence to suggest that psychologists in the United States favor cultural explanations over psychological explanations when considering the behavior and cognition of racial/ethnic minorities, whereas the opposite pattern emerged in reference to Whites. The scientific ramifications of this phenomenon, as well as alternatives to overcome it, are discussed in detail. (PsycINFO Database Record
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both white supremacy and normativity shape who and what is studied in developmental science.
“Both white supremacy and normativity shape who and what is studied in developmental science (Causadias et al., 2018; Rogers, Niwa et al., 2021; Spencer, 2021).”
From Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context (2022) · cites this paper as Causadias et al., 2018
Cites
Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis.
Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080 · Cited by 1,453 · see citing works
Ethnic identity and personal well-being of people of color: a meta-analysis
Smith, T. B., & Silva, L. (2011) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021528 · Cited by 779 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, we are unaware of meta-analytic evidence indicating that culture is more influential for minorities than it is for Whites, in part because cultural studies3 on Whites remain scarce (Smith & Silva, 2011; Yoon et al., 2013).”
BackgroundCohen, A. B. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0015308 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Decolonizing Psychological Science: Introduction to the Special Thematic Section
Adams, G., Dobles, I., Gómez, L. H., Kurtiş, T., & Molina, L. E. (2015) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.564 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zestcott, C. A., Blair, I. V., & Stone, J. (2016) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430216642029 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
“Holding pre-conceived notions of an individual ’ s behaviour based on their cultural background may also lead clinicians to ascertain various (problem) behaviours or personal idio-syncrasies as culturally normative when they may reflect genuine psychopathology and the need for treatment [30].”
Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context
Moffitt, U., & Rogers, L. O. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12762 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Both white supremacy and normativity shape who and what is studied in developmental science (Causadias et al., 2018; Rogers, Niwa et al., 2021; Spencer, 2021).”
Background
- Authors
- Causadias, J. M., Vitriol, J. A., & Atkin, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Lehigh University (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-255
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2789695703
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 34.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- racial and ethnic minorities, cultural explanations, psychological explanation, sample composition
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Ethnicity, Humans, Minority Groups, Psychology, Social Behavior, Social Perception, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review