The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective.
Open accessAbstract
Why and when do employees respond to workplace ostracism by withholding their engagement in citizenship behavior? Beyond perspectives proposed in past studies, we offer a new account based on a social identity perspective and propose that workplace ostracism decreases citizenship behavior by undermining employees' identification with the organization. We also theorize that perceived job mobility influences the extent to which employees identify with the organization when being ostracized. These hypotheses were examined in two time-lagged studies conducted in China. The proposed hypotheses were supported by results in Study 1, and findings were generally replicated in Study 2, where effects of other known mediators (i.e., organization-based self-esteem, job engagement, and felt obligation toward the organization) and moderators (i.e., collectivism, power distance, and future orientation) suggested by previous perspectives were controlled. Results of Study 2 provided further support of the hypothesized directional effect of workplace ostracism on citizenship behavior via organizational identification. Our studies support the identification perspective in understanding workplace ostracism and also strengthen the application of this perspective in understanding workplace aggression broadly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consequences of abusive supervision.
Tepper, B. J. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556375 · Cited by 3,810
Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810141004 · Cited by 3,542
The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_07 · Cited by 2,208
Smart Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0015250 · Cited by 942
The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2006) · Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. · doi:10.1037/10893-007 · Cited by 826
A socioanalytic perspective on job performance
Hogan, R., & Shelton, D. (1998) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1102&3_2 · Cited by 364
BEYOND SOCIAL EXCHANGE: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR THEORY AND RESEARCH
Zellars, K. L., & Tepper, B. J. (2004) · Research in personnel and human resources management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22009-0 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12185 · Cited by 532
The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis.
Howard, M. C., Cogswell, J. E., & Smith, M. B. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000453 · Cited by 408
Afsar, B., Maqsoom, A., Shahjehan, A., Afridi, S. A., Nawaz, A., & Fazliani, H. (2020) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1806 · Cited by 308
Abusive supervision, thwarted belongingness, and workplace safety: a group engagement perspective
Yang, L.-Q., Zheng, X., Liu, X., Lu, C.-Q., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000436 · Cited by 69
A Self-Regulation Model of Zhong Yong Thinking and Employee Adaptive Performance
Pan, W., & Sun, L.-Y. (2018) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1017/mor.2017.33 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, C.-H., Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., & Lee, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-378
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W1914812222
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 29.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/apl0000063
- The paper
- Wu, C.-H., Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., & Lee, C. (2016). Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.