The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Promotive and prohibitive ethical voice: Coworker emotions and support for the voice.
Abstract
Despite the importance of ethical voice for advancing ethics in organizations, we know little about how coworkers respond to ethical voice in their work units. Drawing on the fundamental approach/avoidance behavioral system and the promotive and prohibitive distinction in the voice literature, we distinguish between promotive and prohibitive ethical voice and propose that they engender different emotions-elevation (an approach-oriented moral emotion) and feelings of threat (an avoidance-oriented emotion), respectively, in coworkers. We propose that these emotions differentially influence coworker subsequent responses to the ethical voice behavior. In a time-lagged critical incident survey and two experimental studies, we consistently found support for our hypothesis that promotive ethical voice elicits moral elevation in coworkers with subsequent coworker verbal support for the ethical voice (an approach-oriented response). However, results for prohibitive ethical voice were more complex because prohibitive ethical voice leads to mixed emotions in coworkers. It sometimes leads to feelings of threat, with indirect negative effects via threat on coworker support. But surprisingly, it also leads to coworker elevation and hence can have positive indirect effects via elevation on coworker support. We will discuss the research and practical implications of these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Employee Voice and Silence: Taking Stock a Decade Later
Morrison, E. W. (2022) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654 · Cited by 542
Zhao, H.-D., Ma, Y., & Chen, Y.-L. (2025) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-06-2024-0939 · Cited by 38
Gok, K., Babalola, M. T., Lakshman, C., Sumanth, J. J., Vo, L.-C., Decoster, S., Bansal, A., & Çoşkun, A. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2667 · Cited by 42
Chaudhary, R., Singh, A., & Srivastava, S. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05558-y · Cited by 34
Kim, D., Choi, D., & Son, S. Y. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05477-y · Cited by 33
“However, scholars argue that ethical voice from coworkers can influence their peers and contribute to their motivation to practice ethically (e.g., Bain et al., 2021; Chen & Treviño, 2022).”
InfluentialHarnessing the power of employee voice for individual and organizational effectiveness
Maynes, T. D., Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., & Yoo, A. N. (2024) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2024.02.005 · Cited by 30
Xiang, Y., Chen, L., Zhenya, Z., & Sun, X. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114793 · Cited by 29
Bai, J.-Y., Wong, I. A., Huan, T.-C. T. C., Okumus, F., & Leong, A. (2025) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105242 · Cited by 25
Hu, X., Yan, H., Jiang, Z., & Yeo, G. (2023) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103911 · Cited by 27
A systematic review of employee voice literature in hospitality
Huang, Y., Sharma, A., & Yu, H. C. (2023) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.08.012 · Cited by 20
Lin, X., Meng, L., & Chen, L. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115541 · Cited by 17
Farh, C. I. C., Li, J., & Lee, T. (2022) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0159 · Cited by 14
“I Just Need to Say Something”: A Self‐Determination Model of Voice
Li, A., Kong, D. T., Zhou, Z. E., Crossley, C., & Lin, Q. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2868 · Cited by 14
“In contrast, given the more critical nature of prohibitive voice, others may dismiss the issues that are raised (A. Chen and Trevino 2022).”
Chen, W., Zheng, B., & Liu, H. (2024) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-04-2023-0300 · Cited by 12
Safety Listening in Organizations: An Integrated Conceptual Review
Pandolfo, A. M., Reader, T. W., & Gillespie, A. (2024) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866241245276 · Cited by 13
“…studies have typically examined speaking-up with safety-related information (Noort et al., 2019), or incorporated related concepts like employee voice (Morrison, 2014); whistleblowing (Near & Miceli, 1985); voice in action teams (Krenz & Burtscher, 2021); and ethical voice (Chen & Treviño, 2022).”
Nieberle, K. W., & Fladerer, M. P. (2025) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866251317929 · Cited by 13
“Ethical voice in turn expresses “ concerns about violations of societal ethical standards ( … ) and/or suggestions about upholding societal ethical standards ” (Chen & Treviño, 2022, p. 1973).”
InfluentialEthics and honesty in organizations: Unique organizational challenges
Derfler-Rozin, R. R., & Park, H. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101401 · Cited by 11
Tian, X., Chae, H., Song, D., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17500-5 · Cited by 10
“This dilemma creates an internal conflict: while prohibitive voice behavior could prevent organizational failure and promote ethical behavior, it may also expose employees to backlash or social exclusion 31–33 .”
Molines, M., Storme, M., & Mifsud, M. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2257213 · Cited by 10
“From a theoretical and practical standpoint, it is important to understand how to reduce the negative effect of LMX ambivalence (Chen and Trevino 2022; Lee et al. 2019).”
Jiang, S., Jia, J., Gao, R., & Ma, J. (2025) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105130 · Cited by 12
Thoroughgood, C. N., Sawyer, K. B., Kong, D. T., & Webster, J. R. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063241241312 · Cited by 10
“…is a context-dependent, low-frequency phenomenon, Prolific also allowed us to survey employees across various organizations to capture natural variation in risk perceptions and identify a sufficient number of participants who had witnessed OC for racial or ethnic minorities (Chen & Treviño, 2022).”
Liu, C., Yuan, Q., & Luo, J. (2024) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08933189241284598 · Cited by 10
“The employee voice literature distinguishes promotive from prohibitive voice and reveals the framing effect of employee voice (Chamberlin et al., 2017; Chen & Treviño, 2022; Huang et al., 2018; Liang et al., 2019; Lin & Johnson, 2015; Song et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2015).”
Lee, R., Klotz, A. C., McClean, S. T., Ilieș, R., & Zhang, J. H. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063241247499 · Cited by 7
“That said, based on our literature review on this theoretical perspective (e.g., Chen & Treviño, 2022; Ferris et al., 2016; Roth & Cohen, 1986), this theory and its relevant research are unable to offer guidance regarding for whom customer creativity might elicit more approach-oriented versus…”
Zhong, R., Lee, S. H., & Deng, Y. (2025) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104440 · Cited by 6
Oc, B., & Kouchaki, M. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05431-y · Cited by 6
“Although employees can help the functioning of their group by raising moral concerns, they might experience social costs associated with their voice (e.g., Bashshur and Oc, 2015; Chen and Treviño, 2022; Wellman et al., 2016).”
Zhou, X., Chong, S., & Tong, J. S. (2023) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12485 · Cited by 6
Burris, E. R., Howell, T. M., Stubben, S. R., & Welch, K. (2025) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2022.0352 · Cited by 5
When Your Friend is My Friend: How Loyalty Prompts Support for Indirect Ties in Moral Dilemmas
Berry, Z., & Hildreth, J. A. D. (2024) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.18003 · Cited by 5
Hong, S. H., & Thoroughgood, C. N. (2025) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011251392635 · Cited by 4
“…greater experimental realism in vignette studies (Aguinis & Bradley, 2014), we constructed two gratitude expression scenarios based on the critical incident descriptions in our pilot study (for a similar approach, see Chen & Treviño, 2022; Thoroughgood et al., 2021; Thoroughgood et al., 2024).”
When Inviting Voice Backfires: How Leader Dominance Shapes Employee Responses to Voice Solicitation
Qi, S. O. N. G., Yang, S., Chen, Y., Ren, S., & Guo, Y. (2026) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.70052 · Cited by 5
Kim, D., & Vandenberghe, C. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.1701 · Cited by 3
Yuan, M., Zhou, X., Luo, R., Lou, J., Ye, Q., Chen, X., & Feng, B. (2025) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2025.108717 · Cited by 3
Rubel, M. R. B., Islam, M. N., Islam, M. A., & Rimi, N. N. (2025) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-12-2024-0430 · Cited by 4
Wang, Y., Luo, J., Guo, L., & Zhao, H. (2025) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-025-06213-4 · Cited by 2
“Ethical voice is defined as employees’ expressions of constructive suggestions or concerns about ethical issues (Chen & Treviño, 2022; Huang & Paterson, 2017).”
Xiang, Y., Chen, L., Sun, X., & Feng, X. (2025) · Journal of business and psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-024-10003-6 · Cited by 4
“…on how organizations can encourage ethical voice among employees (e.g., Zhao et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2022), but some have cautioned that the exposure of ethical issues risks negative consequences including adverse coworker feedback (Chen & Trevino, 2022, 2023) and retaliation (Morrison, 2011).”
InfluentialNot So Fast? Rapid Response to Voice Leads to Perceived Inauthenticity
Chon, D., Sezer, O., & Flynn, F. J. (2025) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2023.1044 · Cited by 2
When Will Employees Voice Up? Leader-Member Exchange Similarity and Leader Group Prototypicality
Wu, J., van Knippenberg, D., Giessner, S. R., & Wong, S. I. (2025) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/15480518251386490 · Cited by 3
“Because of its problem-focused and potentially critical tone, prohibitive voice is more likely to be perceived as confrontational, evoke defen-siveness, and generate interpersonal tension (Chen & Treviño, 2022).”
Yan, R., Tang, Z. A., Liu, D., & Yao, S. (2025) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-025-10090-z · Cited by 2
Wang, Y., Luo, J., & Wang, X. C. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-025-10093-7 · Cited by 2
Baghel, R., & Agrawal, A. K. (2026) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-12-2025-0776 · Cited by 2
Lv, B., Xiao, J., Jin, P., Xue, H., Xue, J., & Men, C. (2026) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.70101 · Cited by 2
Antecedents of voice endorsement: a communication perspective
Wang, T., Xu, Y. Q., & Li, J. (2023) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-07-2022-0241 · Cited by 2
Qi, S. O. N. G., Ren, Q., Yang, C. H. E. N., & Ren, Y. (2023) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2023.02013 · Cited by 2
The contagion of ethical voice among peers: an attribution perspective
Zhao, N., He, B., & Sun, X. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-05958-x · Cited by 2
“For example, an ethical suggestion that emphasizes avoiding violations of societal ethical standards may be detrimental to the organization (at least in the short term), such as companies should not harm customers by selling dangerous products (Chen & Treviño, 2022).”
InfluentialMaraşlı, F., Gölgeci̇, İ., Akgün, A. E., Müceldili, B., & Arslan, A. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-02-2024-0079 · Cited by 2
Huang, H., Ruan, W.-Q., Li, Y., & Zhang, S.-N. (2025) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875251349237 · Cited by 2
“Through multiple sub-studies, we clarify the dual mediation pathways through which tourists approach and avoid cultural heritage conservation commitment, revealing the binary transmission mechanism of the approach-avoidance system (A. Chen & Trevin˜o, 2022).”
InfluentialPromotive and prohibitive ethical voice in groups: the effect of faultlines and role ambiguity
Qi, M., & Liu, F. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02799-8 · Cited by 2
“Second, our study is a response to calls for moderators of ethical voice (Chen and Treviño, 2022) and regulatory focus perspectives (Liu et al. 2023) by exploring the role of group role ambiguity.”
InfluentialCoworkers’ self-leadership and employees’ knowledge sharing: a moderated chain mediation model
Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Guoqing, D., & Lu, H. (2025) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-03-2024-0170 · Cited by 5
Ling, C., Zhang, M. J., Wang, M., Liu, W., & Xie, X. (2025) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-025-10054-3 · Cited by 1
Echoes of integrity: how and when leader integrity influences employee moral voice?
Cai, W., & Song, J. (2025) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-02-2025-0096 · Cited by 1
Xiang, Y., & Chen, L. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.70029 · Cited by 1
Leadership, Communication, and Employee Commitment in Digital Transformation: An Integrated Review
Musaigwa, M., & Kalitanyi, V. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Research in Business and Management · doi:10.51137/wrp.ijarbm.488 · Cited by 6
Lin-Schilstra, L., He, M., & Cai, W. (2026) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116032 · Cited by 1
Ye, Q., Yan, Y., Ye, S., & Liu, F. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04910-7 · Cited by 1
“Nurses who provide suggestions may face interpersonal tension, negative evaluations, or concerns that their opinions will not be accepted [36, 37].”
Inspired to Serve: Exposure to Moral Models to Enhance Public Service Motivation
Wang, X. (., Perry, J. L., Wang, Y., Chen, D., & Liu, B. (2026) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70091 · Cited by 1
Qi, M., Feng, B., Liu, F., & Qian, T. (2024) · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12685 · Cited by 1
Osborne, M. R., Cratsley, M. J., Massey, M., & Rice, V. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tc5vq · Cited by 1
Is Thinking the Big Picture a Leader's Favorite in Psychologically Safe Conditions During Covid-19?
Lin, H.-C. (2022) · International Journal of Economics Business and Management Research · doi:10.51505/ijebmr.2022.6606
“However, when employees make many suggestions, inevitably, some suggestions will not be regarded as useful, value-added, or practical by others (Chen & Trevino, 2022; Ng et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2019).”
BackgroundCulture of Fear in Hotel Businesses
Yaşar, E. (2024) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3466-9.ch007
He, C., & Sanusi, E. S. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4904361
Qi, M., Li, M., & Wang, W. (2025) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.70007
Lin, P., Moslehpour, M., & Sulistiawan, J. (2025) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-06-2024-0393
Wang, Y.-M., Luo, J., Wang, X.-Y., Cao, L., & Yi, M. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-025-10035-3
“Following the best practices of research employing critical incident technique to aid in the accuracy and the vividness of retrospection (e.g., Chen & Treviño, 2022 ; Kim & Zhan, 2023; Mitchell et al., 2015), we asked the participants to recall and write down the names of the subordinates that…”
The inspirational value of whistleblowing in the organization: an attributional perspective
Khan, S. R. (2025) · Journal of Management and Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-025-09759-7
“(Chen & Trevino, 2022, p. 2).”
InfluentialGreat minds think alike: How will witnesses react to the voicer's similar idea?
Peng, T., Zhong, J., Zhu, Y., & Duan, J. (2025) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.70068
Zhang, K., & Cui, Z. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04206-0
“Ethical voice refers to the moral behaviour exhibited by an individual who chooses to exercise his or her voice in response to an ethical issue within an organization, and it is the result of an individual’s moral decision-making in response to multiple possible choices [22].”
Hu, X., Gao, H., Chen, C., & Xu, C. (2026) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-11-2024-1017
Doing good keeps evil away: the impact of employee ethical voice on leaders’ unethical directives
Sun, X., Mi, K., Li, S., & Zhang, H. (2026) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-12-2024-0785
Wu, B., Tu, Y., & Xu, Z. (2026) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1080/13602381.2026.2646228
Lan, Y., Liang, Q., Ni, J., Xi, Y., & Wang, J. (2026) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-02-2025-0221
Speaking up, acting out: The moral licensing dynamics linking ethical voice to unethical behavior
Liang, S.-G. (2026) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.70105
Dong, N., Xing, L. L., Y, L., Sheldon, O. J., Yin, K., & Gu, W. (2026) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.70126
Yuan, Q., Zhang, P., Liu, H., Li, T., & Liu, C. (2026) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/23294884261453060
Mitonga-Monga, J., & Kaleke, S. (2026) · International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) · doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.4965
QI, S., Ma, R., Ren, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2026) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116347
When my coworker voices similar ideas to mine: Effects of dyadic idea similarity for future voice
Zhu, Y., Peng, T., Duan, J., & Wang, X. (2026) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.70135
Manxhari, M., Çengeli, M., & Veliu, L. (2026) · Baltic Journal of Economic Studies · doi:10.30525/2256-0742/2026-12-3-229-243 · Cited by 1
Enviable Support: How and When Advantageous Voice Endorsement Fosters Employee Silence
Song, B., Ma, J., Gong, Y., & Shang, Z. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06412-7
Workplace ostracism and employees' ethical voice: the moderating role of conscientiousness
Pham, T. K. T. (2026) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration · doi:10.1108/apjba-01-2026-0061
Qin, X., Yu, W., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-04-2026-0537
Speaking up with integrity: how moral ownership connects moral agency and ethical voice
Yadav, R. S., Panda, A., & Jena, L. K. (2026) · European Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1108/ejms-12-2025-0229
Speaking up for security: the role of safety voice in improving organizational information security
Marett, K., & Marett, E. G. (2026) · Organizational Cybersecurity Journal Practice Process and People · doi:10.1108/ocj-08-2025-0033 · Cited by 1
Sherf, E. N., Lee, M. Y., & McElroy, T. (2026) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2025.0064
Sharifi, T., Mercer, M. E., & Chan, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7635151
Yan, R., Tang, Z., Hu, Z., Liu, D., & Yao, S. (2026) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-03-2025-0315
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, A., & Treviño, L. K.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1973-1994
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W4205570073
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Smeal College of Business
- National University of Singapore
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Keywords
- ethical voice, moral elevation, organizational ethics, moral emotions
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Employment, Humans, Morals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review