Cited by 14Ethics in Business and EducationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Prohibitive Voice as a Moral Act: The Role of Moral Identity, Leaders, and Workgroups

Mesdaghinia, Salar, Shapiro, Debra L., Eisenberger, Robert·2022·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-021-04862-9

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mesdaghinia, S., Shapiro, D. L., & Eisenberger, R.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Michigan University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mesdaghinia, Salar
  • Shapiro, Debra L.
  • Eisenberger, Robert
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2021-06-14
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
297-311
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W3172586289
Cited by
14
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
prohibitive voice, leader-member exchange, moral symbolism, interpersonal risk, hospital staff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review