Cited by 77Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsSchool Choice and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Which student and instructional variables are most strongly related to academic motivation in K-12 education? A systematic review of meta-analyses

Open access
Jansen, Thorben, Meyer, Jennifer, Wigfield, Allan, Möller, Jens·2022·Psychological Bulletin

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bul0000354

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jansen, T., Meyer, J., Wigfield, A., & Möller, J.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2022-01
Volume
148
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W4285175221
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 1
FWCI
13.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
academic motivation, K-12 education, student variables, instructional variables, predictors of motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review