Cited by 79Resilience and Mental HealthMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStudent Stress and Coping

Strengthening resilience in military officer cadets: a group-randomized controlled trial of coping and emotion regulatory self-reflection training

Open access
Crane, Monique F., Boga, Danny, Karin, Eyal, Gucciardi, Daniel F., Rapport, Frances, Callen, Joanne, Sinclair, Laura·2019·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This group-randomized control trial examined the efficacy of guided coping and emotion regulatory self-reflection as a means to strengthen resilience by testing the effects of the training on anxiety and depression symptoms and perceived stressor frequency after an intensive stressor period. METHOD: = 96). Surveys occurred at 3 time points: baseline, immediately following the final reflective session (4-weeks postbaseline), and longer-term follow-up (3-months postinitial follow-up). RESULTS: = 0.46; 95% CI [0.15, 0.77]). Longitudinal models demonstrated a time by condition interaction for depression and anxiety, but there was only an effect of condition for perceived stressor frequency. Mediation analyses supported an indirect effect of the intervention on both anxiety and depression via perceived stressor frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial support for the use of guided self-reflection as an alternative to coping skills approaches to resilience training. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000356

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A limited amount of previous literature has shown positive effects of self-reflection on the subsequent development of mental health symptoms in Australian military cadets and on posttraumatic stress symptoms following a debriefing intervention among recently deployed U.S. soldiers.

    “A limited amount of previous literature has shown positive effects of self-reflection on the subsequent development of mental health symptoms in Australian military cadets (2, 3) and on posttraumatic stress symptoms following a debriefing intervention among recently deployed U.S. soldiers (4).”

    From Enhancing resiliency and optimizing readiness in military personnel through psychological flexibility training: design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Crane, M., & Boga, D. (2017). A commentary: Rethinking approaches to resilience and mental health training. Journal of Military and Veterans Health, 25, 30-33. ISSN: 1835-1271.
  2. Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Mezirow, J., (1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 185-198.
  4. Ryan, D.M, & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1. · DOI
  5. Wells, T. S., Horton, J. L., LeardMann, C. A., Jacobson, I. G., & Boyko, E. J. (2013). A comparison of the PRIME-MD PHQ-9 and PHQ-8 in a large military prospective study, the Millennium Cohort Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 148, 77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crane, M. F., Boga, D., Karin, E., Gucciardi, D. F., Rapport, F., Callen, J., & Sinclair, L.
Affiliations
  • Australian Defence Force (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Crane, Monique F.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2019-02
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
125-140
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2903389540
Cited by
79
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Army Research Scheme (WRC006/17)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
resilience training, coping strategies, emotion regulation, self-reflection, anxiety, depression, perceived stress, military personnel
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Australia, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review