Cited by 150Mental Health via WritingPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionArt Therapy and Mental Health

Expressive writing and positive writing for participants with mood disorders: an online randomized controlled trial

Baikie, Karen A., Geerligs, Liesbeth, Wilhelm, Kay·2012·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Introduction Expressive writing--writing about traumatic, stressful or emotional events--often leads to improvements in physical and psychological health in non-clinical and clinical populations. Recent studies have shown that positive writing may also be beneficial. Research has not yet investigated whether either expressive writing or positive writing offers benefits for people with mood disorders.Method Participants were recruited online and were randomly allocated to expressive writing, positive writing or control writing. The following questionnaires were completed online: Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic Languidness (PILL), overall health questions, Temperament and Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) and COPE Inventory (COPE). Participants then wrote for 20 min on 4 occasions, and then completed follow-up questionnaires.Results Linear mixed models with custom contrasts were conducted to assess differences between groups and over time. All 3 groups showed significant improvements over time on mental health and some physical health outcomes. There were no significant differences between groups and no significant group by time interactions. These results were not moderated by demographic factors, personality subtypes or coping styles.Conclusion The expressive writing, positive writing and time management control writing groups all reported significantly fewer mental and physical symptoms for at least 4 months post-writing. When expressive and positive writing groups were combined, the resulting `emotional writing group' showed significantly lower scores on the DASS stress subscale than the control writing group at all time-points. Potential reasons are discussed and areas of further study identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.032

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baikie, K. A., Geerligs, L., & Wilhelm, K.
Affiliations
Black Dog Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Wilhelm, Kay
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
136
Issue
3
Pages
310-319
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025611158
Cited by
150
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
expressive writing, mood disorders, depression, anxiety, stress, emotional writing, mental health, physical health, coping styles, personality, online intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Writing, Mood Disorders, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review