Cited by 18Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The relative efficacy of bona fide cognitive behavioral therapy and applied relaxation for generalized anxiety disorder at follow-up: A longitudinal multilevel meta-analysis.

Flückiger, Christoph, Carratta, Katja, Del Re, A. C., Probst, Greta, Vîslă, Andreea, Gómez Penedo, Juan Martìn, Wampold, Bruce E.·2022·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective This meta-analysis examined the relative efficacy of bona fide psychotherapy conditions in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) from posttreatment to follow-up in adults. Methods Omnibus tests of relative efficacy across bona fide psychotherapies for primary and secondary outcomes were conducted. Longitudinal multilevel subgroup analyses investigated, (a) applied relaxation versus cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) without applied relaxation and (b) well-established CBT versus augmented integrative CBT. Results In total, 54 repeated effect sizes nested in 23 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Omnibus test of relative efficacy indicated no significant differences among the bona fide psychotherapy contrasts in primary and some differences in secondary outcomes. When contrasting applied relaxation with CBT without applied relaxation, negligible relative efficacy differences were found at each assessment time. There were small efficacy differences in favor of augmented integrative CBT in comparison to well-established CBT. Conclusion Small relative efficacy differences were found between bona fide psychotherapies in GAD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000717

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flückiger, C., Carratta, K., Del Re, A. C., Probst, G., Vîslă, A., Gómez Penedo, J. M., & Wampold, B. E.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2022-04
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
339-352
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W4220958303
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation (PZ00P1_136937; PP00P1_163702; PP00P1_190083)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, applied relaxation, relative efficacy, follow-up outcomes, treatment comparison, psychotherapy outcome
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review