Cited by 65LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHealth and Medical Studies

Considerations for transgender population health research based on US national surveys

Lett, Elle, Everhart, Avery·2022·Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract

Transgender identities and health are highly politicized in the United States leading to restrictions on relevant data collection in national health surveillance systems. This has serious implications on transgender population health research; an urgent area of study given the systemic discrimination faced by transgender individuals and the resultant social and health inequities. In this precarious political climate, obtaining high-quality data for research is challenging and in recent years, two data sources have formed the foundation of transgender health research in the United States, namely the 2015 United States Transgender Study and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System after the launch of the optional Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Module in 2014. While useful, there are serious challenges to using these data to study transgender health, specifically related to survey weighting methodologies, ascertainment of gender identity, and study design. In this article, we detail these challenges and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of various methodological approaches that have been implemented as well as clarify several common errors that exist in the literature. We feel that this contribution is necessary to provide accurate interpretation of the evidence that currently informs policy and priority setting for transgender population health and will provide vital insights for future studies with these now ubiquitous sources of data in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.10.009

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lett, E., & Everhart, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Lett, Elle
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
65
Pages
65-71
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210093881
Cited by
65
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
transgender health, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, survey weighting, health disparities, transgender discrimination, research design
MeSH terms
Population Health, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Transsexualism, United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review