Cited by 22Digital Mental Health InterventionsStudent Stress and CopingMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Moderators of the efficacy of a web-based stress management intervention for college students.

Coudray, Carissa, Palmer, Riley, Frazier, Patricia·2019·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

= 782) to examine moderators of the efficacy of a web-based stress management intervention that focused on increasing perceived present control (i.e., aspects of stressors that are controllable in the present). Specific moderators assessed in regression analyses were baseline scores on outcome measures (perceived stress, stress symptoms, anxiety, depression) and the putative mechanism (perceived present control) of the intervention. Baseline symptom levels moderated the effects of the intervention on all outcomes, such that the intervention was more effective for students with more baseline symptoms. Baseline levels of present control had less consistent moderating effects, but significant interactions indicated that the intervention was more effective for those with lower levels of present control. The novel Johnson-Neyman technique was used to identify specific cutoff scores on these measures, below which the effect of the intervention was not significant, and scores on the measures associated with varying effect sizes. Findings from the Johnson-Neyman analyses can inform the development of screening criteria for future research and clinical application. Because the intervention was more effective for students with higher levels of baseline distress, it may be better suited for an indicated rather than universal prevention approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cou0000340

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coudray, C., Palmer, R., & Frazier, P.
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2019-11
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
747-754
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2938255757
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
online intervention, stress management, university students, perceived stress, stress symptoms, anxiety, depression, screening criteria, indicated prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Stress, Psychological, Students, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Universities, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review