Cited by 67Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMental Health Treatment and Access

E-mental health in Australia: Implications of the internet and related technologies for policy: (677122010-001)

Christensen, Helen, Griffiths, Kathleen M., Evans, Kimberley·2002·PsycEXTRA Dataset

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/e677122010-001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online delivery may be a relatively inexpensive means of delivering treatments to a wide range of people, particularly for rural residents whose access to in-person interventions may be limited.

    “In addition, online delivery may be a relatively inexpensive means of delivering treatments to a wide range of people [53], particularly for rural residents [54] whose access to in-person interventions may be limited.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., & Evans, K.
Venue
PsycEXTRA Dataset
Published
2002
OpenAlex
W2912672336
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
e-mental health, internet-based mental health services, digital mental health tools, mental health policy, Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review