Cited by 22Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Facilitating mental health help seeking in young adults: the underlying theory and development of an online navigation tool

Kauer, Sylvia, Buhagiar, Kerrie, Sanci, Lena·2017·Advances in Mental Health

Abstract

Objective: This paper describes the theoretical basis of the Link program, a world-first dedicated online navigation tool to facilitate mental health help-seeking for young adults.Method: Several theories of help-seeking and behaviour change were explored to determine a useful theoretical framework for the Link program, a world-first dedicated online navigation tool to facilitate mental health help-seeking for young adults.Results: Four commonly used theories of behavioural change were examined with the Theory of Planned Behaviour found to best match the objectives of the Link program. Previous interventions aimed at increasing help-seeking behaviour and intentions using the Theory of Planned Behaviour found that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control beliefs have a role in help-seeking. Combined with elements of the Help Seeking Model, due to its specificity in mental health help-seeking, the Theory of Planned Behaviour was selected as the theoretical framework of the Link program. The resultant prototype allows young adults to enter information about an issue they are facing, the severity of the issue, and the type of services they prefer. Recommendations for information or services are then presented based upon these individual needs.Discussion: Little is known about the effects online services have on emotional affect and whether these services facilitate help-seeking in young people. Detailed description of this developmental work will assist in understanding the mechanisms underpinning the Link program. Further research will evaluate the effectiveness of the Link program in improving help-seeking, emotions, and mental health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/18387357.2016.1237856

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kauer, S., Buhagiar, K., & Sanci, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • ReachOut, Pyrmont, NSW, Australia
Corresponding author
Kauer, Sylvia
Venue
Advances in Mental Health
Published
2016-10-31
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
71-87
ISSN
  • 1446-7984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1838-7357
  • 1837-4905
OpenAlex
W2546870163
Cited by
22
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre
  • University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
mental health help-seeking, young adults, theory of planned behavior, behaviour change theory, help-seeking intentions, online mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review