Cited by 27Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMental Health Treatment and Access

The Acceptability of E-mental Health Services for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Systematic Search and Review

Struthers, Ashley, Charette, Catherine, Bapuji, Sunita Bayyavarapu, Winters, Shannon, Ye, Xibiao, Metge, Colleen, Kreindler, Sara, Raynard, Melissa +3 more·2015·Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a systematic search and review examining the acceptability of e-mental health services for children, adolescents, and young adults and their parents and healthcare providers. Multiple databases were searched and abstracts were screened to determine if they met study inclusion criteria. Findings from included studies were synthesized within five dimensions of acceptability: satisfaction, client expectations, uptake, adherence and patient/provider experiences. Twenty-four studies were included, and findings suggest that although clients are generally satisfied with e-mental health and report positive experiences, adherence and uptake can be challenges. In conclusion, e-mental health appears to be an acceptable intervention option for children, adolescents, and young adults and their parents and healthcare providers. Further research is needed to better understand the effectiveness and acceptability of e-mental health for this population, including adherence, patient and provider experiences and integration into existing health systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7870/cjcmh-2015-006

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review on the acceptability of online mental health programs for adolescents and young people found that drop-out rates were higher than the average when there was no concurrent therapist contact alongside digital components.

    “A review on the acceptability of online mental health programs for adolescents and young people found that drop-out rates were higher than the average when there was no concurrent therapist contact alongside digital components52.”
  • Virtual guidance provided by the automated CA itself might not be enough, and human assistance is needed besides the virtual assistance.

    “Although there is virtual guidance provided by the automated CA itself, it seems this might not be enough, and human assistance is needed besides the virtual assistance52.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Struthers, A., Charette, C., Bapuji, S. B., Winters, S., Ye, X., Metge, C., Kreindler, S., Raynard, M., Lemaire, J., Synyshyn, M., & Sutherland, K.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Healthcare Innovation
  • George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation (CA)
  • Concordia Hospital (CA)
  • Addictions Foundation of Manitoba
  • Manitoba Adolescent Treatment Centre
Venue
Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health
Published
2015-07-01
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
1-21
ISSN
0713-3936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1953211836
Cited by
27
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
e-mental health, acceptability, children, adolescents, young adults, parents, healthcare workers, client satisfaction, service uptake, medication adherence, patient experience, provider experiences, digital mental health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review